Organic Sorghum Seed Systems: From Plant Breeding to the Organic Farm

Organic sorghum begins long before planting. This publication looks at how plant breeding, seed quality, soil biology, organic production, and farmer testing work together to move better sorghum genetics from the breeding program to the organic farm.

This material is adapted from a presentation prepared for the 2026 Global Sorghum Conference, held September 14–18 in Lubbock, Texas. The Conference was hosted by Texas Tech University in partnership with the Global Sorghum Association and the conference brought together more than 400 participants from 20 countries. The next conference will be held in Australia in a few years, and I certainly hope to attend!

Close-up image of organic sorghum seeds with a textured background, accompanied by informative text about the importance of seeds in organic sorghum production.

Figure 1. Organic sorghum begins with genetics, but successful seed systems also depend on biological performance, agronomic adaptation, and market availability.

Organic Sorghum Starts With Seed

Sorghum fits organic agriculture particularly well. It is drought and heat adapted, works in rotations, and can serve grain, forage, livestock, and increasingly specialty food markets.

But there is a bottleneck.

The farmer can only plant the genetics that somebody is willing and able to put in a seed bag.

In my experience, organic sorghum seed availability has not kept pace with the need for regionally adapted genetics and greater seed choice.

So, when I say organic sorghum begins with seed, I mean that every successful crop begins long before the planter enters the field.

A presentation slide titled 'What Does an Organic Farmer Need From Sorghum Seed?' featuring three sections: 'Get Up,' 'Compete,' and 'Finish,' with key points on ideal sorghum seed characteristics. To the right, there is an image of young sorghum plants in biodegradable pots, highlighting healthy growth.

Figure 2. Organic sorghum varieties for organic production must establish rapidly, compete effectively, and finish with acceptable yield and grain quality.

What Does an Organic Farmer Need From Sorghum Seed?

I think about what an organic farmer needs from sorghum in three very simple stages.

First, it has to GET UP.

We need germination, vigor, rapid emergence, good coleoptile development, and strong early rooting. We do not have the same ability to compensate for weak establishment without seed treatments prohibited in organic production.

Second, it has to COMPETE.

Early growth, canopy development, rooting (fast and deep), nutrient acquisition, and weed competitiveness become part of our weed and fertility management system.

And then it has to FINISH.

It has to resist disease and insects, remain standing (no lodging), mature properly, produce quality grain, and ultimately yield.

The important distinction is this:

In an organic system, we often ask the plant to perform some of the functions that conventional agriculture asks inputs to perform.

Infographic detailing the impact of organic farming on microbial diversity and its significance for sorghum seed.

Figure 3. Seed enters an existing biological system shaped by soil, climate, cropping history, and management.

The Seed Enters a Biological System

There is another dimension that we are becoming increasingly interested in: biology.

In our long-term organic cotton and sorghum fields, we are documenting greater microbial diversity, increasingly structured microbial communities, and functional specialization over time.

We are also seeing microbial populations associated with nutrient mineralization, soil aggregation, plant–microbe interaction, and resilience to stress.

But I want to emphasize something important.

There does not appear to be one universal “organic microbiome.”

Instead, organic management seems to strengthen environmental selection. Each field develops a community influenced by its soil, climate, cropping history, and management.

Now introduce seed into that system.

The seed itself carries microorganisms.1 Those organisms enter a soil containing an already established microbial community, and different plant genotypes may interact differently with that biology.2

So one research question I think deserves much more attention is:

If the soil microbiome becomes locally adapted, should we also be considering the seed microbiome as part of crop adaptation? Testing, testing, testing!

Perhaps eventually we need to think beyond simply genotype by environment toward genotype × environment × microbiome × management.

A man in a cap examining sorghum plants in a greenhouse, with notes about breeding and selection for organic sorghum displayed alongside.

Figure 4. Organic sorghum breeding targets extend beyond yield to establishment, competition, resilience, harvestability, and market quality.

What Should We Breed and Select For in Organic Sorghum?

Earlier I showed you what the farmer needs from the plant. Now I want to turn those production needs into breeding targets.

I am not suggesting that yield becomes less important. Farmers are still paid for yield.

But the pathway to that yield may be different in an organic system.

For establishment, vigor, emergence, rooting, and seedling disease resistance may become especially valuable.

For competition, early biomass, canopy development, weed competitiveness, and nutrient capture matter.

For resilience, sorghum already gives us tremendous strengths in heat and drought tolerance, stay-green, disease resistance, and yield stability.

And ultimately we still need standability, uniform maturity, grain quality, and the end-use characteristics the market wants.

One additional question is plant–microbe recruitment. “Can we eventually identify or select sorghum that interacts particularly well with beneficial soil organisms?”

We cannot select effectively for an organic production system unless we actually observe phenotype under that production system. The genotype may look excellent on paper or in another environment, but we have to see how it expresses itself where nitrogen release is biological, weed competition is real, and seedling protection is limited.

We may need to put more selection pressure on traits that allow the plant to solve problems for itself.

Infographic titled 'Producing Organic Sorghum Seed: Protecting Purity and Performance' from Texas A&M Agrilife Extension. It outlines key practices for maintaining genetic purity, managing seed crops, and ensuring seed quality in sorghum seed production.

Figure 5. Organic seed production must protect genetic purity, crop performance, seed quality, and organic integrity.

Producing Organic Sorghum Seed: Protecting Purity and Performance

Once we identify the genetics we want, somebody still has to produce the seed.

And seed production is not grain production.

With grain, I am primarily concerned about what I harvest this year. With seed, I am responsible for what happens in somebody else’s field next year.

First, we protect genetic purity through field isolation, regularly rogueing any off-types, and managing pollen movement and flowering.

Second, we protect the seed crop.

Weed control during flowering and seed fill matters.

Fertility has to be synchronized with crop demand using organic sources.

Disease management becomes especially important, and establishment has to occur without the conventional synthetic seed treatments that may normally provide some protection.

Finally, we protect the seed at harvest. Timing, uniform maturity, weathering, and deterioration all affect the quality of what eventually goes into the seed bag.

So we are trying to preserve genetic identity, biological quality, and organic integrity simultaneously.

Infographic titled 'Organic Seed Quality Does Not End at Harvest', detailing physical, biological, and organic integrity factors related to seed quality after harvest. Includes icons representing harvesting, cleaning, conditioning, storing, testing, and bagging seeds.

Figure 6. Seed quality can be preserved or degraded at every step from harvest through cleaning, conditioning, storage, testing, and bagging.

Organic Seed Quality Does Not End at Harvest

Harvest does not finish seed production.

In fact, every step shown here can either preserve seed quality or degrade it.

Harvest can mechanically damage seed through improper combine settings, augers, handling, and repeated drops.

Cleaning removes contaminants, but poorly adjusted equipment can also damage seed.

Conditioning or seed sizing influences uniformity and physical quality.

Storage conditions affect germination, vigor, and longevity, while insect management must remain compatible with organic requirements.

Testing tells us whether the seed still performs as expected.

Bagging must preserve lot identity, traceability, and certified organic integrity.

For organic seed there is an additional layer: equipment cleanliness, commingling prevention, lot identity, weed seed contamination, and documentation all matter.

And biologically, we increasingly need to think about seed health, seedborne pathogens, and perhaps what these processes are doing to the seed microbiome.

The field produces the seed, but post-harvest handling determines whether that seed reaches the farmer with its quality and integrity intact.

And this is where market integrity enters the seed system. Organic operates as an identity-preserved, documented production and handling system. The seed not only has to germinate; we must be able to document what it is, where it came from, and that its organic integrity was maintained.

Flowchart detailing TAMU Organic Breeding Programs, including on-farm organic trials for various crops, organic testing, farmer strips, regional testing, and seed increase.

Figure 7. Promising genetics should move progressively from breeding nurseries to organic testing, farmer strips, regional evaluation, and ultimately seed increase.

Test It Where It Will Be Grown

This may be the most practical recommendation I can give the breeding community.

Test promising material in the environment where you expect farmers to grow it.

At Texas A&M we are increasingly moving material from breeding programs into certified organic fields—not only sorghum, but wheat, corn, cotton, cowpea, guar, peanuts, and other crops.

The progression I would like to see become more routine is simple:

breeding nursery → organic testing → farmer strip → regional testing → seed increase.

We do not need every breeding program to become an organic breeding program.

But organic production should become one of the environments in which promising germplasm is evaluated.

Farmers also need to participate earlier. They see things in larger fields that we may never see in a small research plot—emergence problems, weed competitiveness, maturity differences, harvestability, and management interactions.

That farmer feedback should then move back into the breeding program.

Building Better Organic Sorghum Seed Systems

Better organic sorghum does not end with better genetics. The genetics must be evaluated under organic management, multiplied without losing purity or quality, handled carefully after harvest, and ultimately placed in the hands of farmers who can test them under real production conditions.

If we want organic sorghum production to grow, we cannot simply breed better sorghum. We must build better seed systems. That means breeders, agronomists, seed producers, organic farmers, researchers, certifiers, and markets working together to move useful genetics all the way from the breeding program to the farm.

References

  1. Johnston-Monje, D., J. P. Gutiérrez, and L. A. Becerra Lopez-Lavalle. 2021. “Seed-Transmitted Bacteria and Fungi Dominate Juvenile Plant Microbiomes.” Frontiers in Microbiology 12:737616. ↩︎
  2. Sanz-Puente, I., S. Redondo-Salvo, G. Torres-Cortés, M. de Toro, S. Fernandes, A. Börner, Ó. Lorenzo, F. de la Cruz, and M. Robledo. 2025. “Seed-mediated vertical transmission of Pantoea core endophytes.” The ISME Journal 19(1): wraf192. ↩︎
Text graphic featuring the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program, and Transition to Organic Partnership Program, with the USDA Organic logo.

Organic Farmers Should Secure Manure and Compost Early for 2027

Rising commercial fertilizer prices could increase competition for manure, compost, and other organic fertility inputs. Organic farmers may want to contact suppliers now and begin securing the nutrients they will need for the 2027 crop.

Harvest is underway or approaching across much of Texas, so fertilizer for next year may not be at the top of anyone’s list right now. But for organic farmers, I think it deserves some attention before we get much farther into fall.

Commercial fertilizer prices have generally moved higher during 2026, particularly for nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers. Current fertilizer market reports are also raising concerns about higher fertility costs for the 2027 crop. University of Illinois farm economists recently noted that nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer prices are higher going into fall and that farmers are already beginning to make fertilizer purchasing decisions for 2027.1

Line graph depicting DAP, Anhydrous Ammonia, and Sulfur prices from January 2024 to September 2026, showing price trends in dollars per ton.

Farmdoc Daily graph showing DAP, anhydrous ammonia, and sulfur prices from January 2024 through September 2026. DAP and anhydrous ammonia prices increased during 2025 and remained elevated in 2026, while sulfur prices rose especially sharply, climbing from below $300 per ton in early 2025 to more than $1,000 per ton in mid-2026. Source: GreenMarkets via Bloomberg; graph by farmdoc Daily, University of Illinois.

Why should an organic farmer care about the price of urea, DAP, or anhydrous ammonia when those products are not part of an organic fertility program?

Because conventional fertilizer prices help determine the value of manure, compost, poultry litter, and other nutrient sources that organic farmers depend upon.

When commercial nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium become more expensive, manure and compost become more valuable to conventional farmers as alternative fertilizer sources. A farmer who may not normally consider poultry litter or manure can quickly become interested when the nutrients in that material cost substantially less than purchasing the same nutrients in a fertilizer blend.

That means organic farmers may face more competition for the same products they routinely use.

In January, I normally update my “What Is the True Cost of Compost or Manure?” calculations using current fertilizer and manure prices. The purpose is to compare the nutrient value of manure or compost with the cost of replacing those same nutrients using conventional fertilizer.

Those January 2026 calculations already showed why this matters. One poultry manure source priced at about $43 per ton contained nutrients with a calculated fertilizer replacement value of more than $100 per ton before considering hauling and application costs. As conventional fertilizer prices rise, that replacement value rises as well—even though the manure itself has not changed.

This does not mean every organic producer should rush out and buy whatever manure or compost is available. Nutrient analysis still matters. Transportation matters. Application cost matters. Phosphorus loading matters. And organic producers still need to verify that any material they use complies with their Organic System Plan and certification requirements.

But I do think it means we should start asking questions now.

If you know you will need manure, compost, poultry litter, pelleted fertilizer, or another organic fertility product for the 2027 crop, contact your supplier. Ask what they expect to have available. Ask about price. Get a current nutrient analysis. Calculate how many tons you are likely to need. And perhaps most importantly, find out whether that material can be reserved or contracted ahead of time.

Interior of a dimly lit agricultural building with rows of soil or compost piles, and a tractor in the background dust cloud.

Rows of composting poultry litter are turned and managed inside a covered composting facility. The windrows help promote aeration and controlled decomposition, producing a more uniform organic fertilizer material for agricultural use. Photo courtesy of ViaTrac Fertilizer, used from the ViaTrac Fertilizer photo gallery: https://viatracfertilizer.com/gallery/

Waiting until January or February may mean entering the market after many conventional farmers have already begun looking for the same nutrients.

There is still considerable uncertainty in fertilizer markets, and I am not trying to predict exactly what fertilizer will cost next spring. Retail prices can lag wholesale markets because of inventories, transportation, and purchasing decisions made months earlier.

For an organic farmer, the important message is simpler:

Do not wait for fertilizer prices to tell you that manure and compost have become valuable. Someone else may have already figured that out.

I will update the full compost and manure cost comparison again in January as I normally do. But between now and then, it may be worth making a few phone calls and making sure your 2027 fertility supply is still going to be there when you need it.

More information:
What Is the True Cost of Compost or Manure?
Organic fertilizer – what is it, what are the rules, where do you buy it?

References:

  1. Paulson, N., G. Schnitkey, C. Zulauf, and A. Dhakal. 2026. “Sulfur and Increasing Phosphate Fertilizer Prices.” farmdoc daily 16(152), Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, August 25, 2026. ↩︎
Text representing the USDA National Organic Program and Transition to Organic Partnership Program with the USDA Organic logo

Texas Organic Experience Comes to the National Organic Standards Board

Texas organic grower and produce-industry leader Jed Murray has been appointed to the National Organic Standards Board, bringing practical experience in organic production, marketing and policy to the national organic program.

USDA has announced five new appointments to the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), and one of those appointments is especially important for Texas organic agriculture: Jed Murray of Texas.

For many people outside Texas, Jed may be known today as Director of Government Relations for the Texas International Produce Association. But for those of us who have worked in Texas organic agriculture, there is much more to the story.

Jed has actually been part of Texas organic agriculture. He has grown organic vegetables, packed and marketed them, worked with retailers, advocated for growers, and helped us explore how Texas-grown organic products could reach larger markets.

I have known Jed for many years, and he has consistently supported Texas organic growers and led efforts to expand opportunities for organic agriculture. He brings to the NOSB practical experience with what it takes to make organic agriculture work from the field all the way to the consumer.

Why the National Organic Standards Board Matters

The NOSB is not simply another USDA advisory committee.

Congress established the 15-member board under the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 to advise the Secretary of Agriculture on organic standards and, particularly, on substances used in organic production and handling. USDA appointed Jed to one of the board’s Public Interest/Consumer Interest Group seats for a five-year term through January 2031.

The NOSB deals with issues that eventually become very practical decisions on organic farms and in organic businesses.

The board reviews substances petitioned for addition to or removal from the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances, conducts the five-year sunset review of materials already on that list, and develops recommendations concerning organic production, handling and policy. Since its establishment, the NOSB has made more than 600 recommendations to USDA.

For an organic farmer or handler, these decisions can determine whether a fertilizer, pesticide, livestock health product, sanitizer, processing aid or other material can be used—and sometimes the specific restrictions placed on its use. Changes to the National List ultimately occur through USDA rulemaking following NOSB recommendations.

In other words, discussions at the NOSB can eventually affect what happens in a Texas organic field, greenhouse, packing shed, dairy, feed mill or processing facility.

Jed Brings More Than an Interest in Organic Agriculture

USDA’s announcement notes that Jed has 20 years of agricultural experience, including 13 years in the vegetable industry. He currently serves as Director of Government Relations for the Texas International Produce Association and Managing Partner of 9 Kids Compost LLC. His involvement also includes the Texas Department of State Health Services Food Safety and Defense Task Force, Texas Vegetable Association and the Texas A&M Vegetable & Fruit Program.

Those credentials are impressive, but they don’t fully explain why his appointment should matter to Texas organic growers.

Jed was an owner and partner in Tenaza Organics in South Texas, where he was directly involved in commercial certified-organic vegetable production. Tenaza produced crops such as parsley, broccoli, beets, spinach, Swiss chard, kale and cabbage and supplied large retailers and restaurants throughout Texas, with some production moving into export markets.

That means Jed understands organic agriculture from the production side—not simply from meetings, policy discussions or reports.

He knows what it means to plant an organic crop, deal with weather and production risk, manage a highly perishable product, meet buyer expectations, maintain organic integrity and then find a market willing to pay for what was produced.

Organic Farming in the Real World

South Texas agriculture can also provide some hard lessons.

Jed and Tenaza experienced firsthand the devastating February 2021 freeze. A year later, he described how the farm had been doing well before suddenly losing essentially its crop during the freeze. I was there in the summer of 2021 and Jed’s crew was working overtime to plant more crops to make up the losses.

Experiences like that give a person a different understanding of agricultural policy.

Organic standards have to protect the integrity of the organic label, but they also have to function on real farms facing drought, freezes, hurricanes, insects, diseases, labor challenges, market changes and the thousand other things agriculture can throw at a producer.

I believe that practical agricultural perspective is particularly valuable on the NOSB.

He Has Already Helped Shape Texas Organic Agriculture

Jed’s involvement with Texas organics has extended well beyond his own farm.

When Texas A&M AgriLife began a project in 2022 to examine opportunities for expanding markets for Texas-grown organic produce, Jed was an important industry collaborator.

At the time, I described him as an avid organic grower, a member of the Texas Department of Agriculture Organic Advisory Board, and an exemplary cooperator with AgriLife Extension. He also provided ideas about opportunities for exporting Texas organic produce.

The TDA Organic Agricultural Industry Advisory Board has an important mission of its own: helping the Commissioner of Agriculture assess, develop, promote and expand the Texas organic agricultural products industry.

So Jed’s new national role follows years of engagement with many of the same questions here in Texas: How do we protect organic integrity while also helping organic agriculture grow? How do we connect farmers with markets? How do regulations affect producers? And how do we maintain consumer confidence in the organic label?

Recognized for Leadership in the Produce Industry

Jed’s work has also been recognized beyond Texas organic circles.

In 2022, American Vegetable Grower selected Tenaza Organics as its Central Region Grower Achievement Award winner. The recognition highlighted not only the farm’s production but Jed’s advocacy for fresh produce, growers, agricultural education and Texas-grown products.

His produce-industry experience also gives him an understanding of the entire organic supply chain—from the farmer to the consumer.

Organic agriculture begins with production practices, but USDA Organic is ultimately a consumer-facing label operating within a federal regulatory system. Maintaining that label requires understanding farmers and handlers while never losing sight of the consumer trust on which the entire organic market depends.

Jed’s experience in production, marketing and public policy gives him insight into each part of that chain.

USDA is getting someone with national produce-industry experience. Those of us in Texas organic agriculture know it is also getting someone who has been in the organic field, worked with organic growers, helped market organic crops and supported the growth of our organic industry for many years.

I am very pleased to see Jed Murray take that experience to the National Organic Standards Board!

More Resources

USDA Announces Five New Members to the National Organic Standards Board
USDA’s announcement and biography of Jed Murray.
Read the USDA announcement

National Organic Standards Board
Background on NOSB membership, responsibilities, meetings and activities.
USDA National Organic Standards Board

NOSB Recommendations
More than 600 recommendations involving organic production practices and materials are available through USDA.
View NOSB recommendations

National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances
Learn how substances are evaluated and regulated for organic crop, livestock and handling operations.
USDA National List information

Helping Expand the Market for Texas-Grown Organic Produce
Texas A&M AgriLife’s 2022 look at expanding domestic and international opportunities for Texas organic produce, including Jed’s involvement.
Read the AgriLife Today article

Tenaza Organics – Grower Achievement Award Regional Winner
A look at Tenaza Organics, its crops, markets and Jed’s work promoting produce and Texas growers.
Read the Growing Produce article

USDA Organic logo and text promoting the Transition to Organic Partnership Program by the United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Marketing Service.

Organic Variety Production Tour – Thursday, September 3rd

New Deal, Texas | Registration begins at 9:30 a.m. | No registration fee

One of the continuing challenges for organic crop producers is finding seed varieties developed for the conditions in which we actually farm. This is especially true in the Texas High Plains, where crops must perform under heat, limited rainfall, declining irrigation capacity, organic fertility programs, and significant insect and disease pressure.

On Thursday, September 3, we will hold an Organic Variety Production Tour in the New Deal–Lubbock area to look at efforts underway to address that problem. This tour is built around a Southern SARE Producer Grant led by Seth Fortenberry of New Deal Grain that is helping develop local capacity to produce and supply non-GMO hybrid corn seed for organic and water-limited cropping systems.

Seth farms organic crops in the Texas High Plains and operates New Deal Grain, an organic grain and seed business. One of the problems he and other organic growers continue to face is the limited availability of non-GMO corn hybrids adapted to the hot, dry conditions of our region. Most corn seed production and much of the breeding work supplying non-GMO hybrids has historically been centered in the Midwest. The goal of this project is to begin closing that gap by taking regionally adapted genetics, producing the seed locally, and ultimately making those hybrids available to organic farmers.

New Deal Grain has licensed TAMZ106B and TAMZ107, two non-GMO corn hybrids developed through the Texas A&M AgriLife corn breeding program. The SARE project is helping Seth build the specialized knowledge and infrastructure needed to increase parent seed, produce hybrid seed, maintain genetic purity, process and condition the harvested seed, and move that seed into commercial production. The project also includes testing these hybrids on certified organic farms and comparing their performance under actual production conditions.

The September tour will use that corn seed project as a starting point, but the discussion will be broader. We will look at corn, sorghum, cowpea and guar plots and talk about what characteristics we need when selecting and developing varieties for organic agriculture. That may include yield, drought and heat tolerance, disease and insect resistance, weed competitiveness, forage quality, food quality, seed production characteristics, and opportunities for alternative markets.

At the Texas Tech corn plots, we will discuss corn breeding, promising crosses, commercial possibilities, and high-anthocyanin or High-A corn being developed for specialty food and health-oriented markets. We will then move to cowpea and guar plots to discuss their potential as cover crops, forage crops, protein crops, and alternative cash crops. The final field discussion will focus on organic sorghum, including variety needs, seed availability, and where we see opportunities for the organic sorghum industry.

This is really a tour about connecting plant breeding, seed production, and farmer needs. Developing a good variety is only the first step. Farmers also need enough high-quality seed, produced and conditioned correctly, at a price and quantity that allows them to actually plant it. Building that connection from the breeder’s plot to the farmer’s planter is one of the important long-term goals of this work.

Tentative Tour Agenda

9:30–10:00 a.m. – Registration, Introductions and Tour Overview at
New Deal Grain – Bob Whitney, Extension Organic Specialist and Seth Fortenberry, New Deal Grain

10:00 a.m. – Depart for Texas Tech Farm – Corn Plots

10:15 a.m. – Corn Breeding and Variety Development
Overview of the corn breeding program, varieties and crosses, potential industry uses, and High-A corn. Andrew Sellers, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Corn Breeding Technician and Bob Whitney

10:45 a.m. – Depart for Sorghum, Cowpea and Guar Plots

10:55 a.m. – Field Overview – Seth Fortenberry

11:00 a.m. – Organic Cowpea and Guar
Discussion of the plots and their potential as cover crops, protein crops, forage crops, and alternative crops for organic production – Dr. Waltram Ravelombola, Assistant Professor, Organic & Specialty Crop Breeding

11:25 a.m. – Organic Sorghum
Sorghum plot discussion, organic sorghum production and variety development, seed needs, and the future of organic sorghum – Dr. Bill Rooney, Professor, Sorghum Crop Breeder and Nick Porter, Senior Research Associate, Sorghum Breeding

12:00 noon – Depart for Lunch at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Lubbock
Lunch provided by Orlando’s

12:45 p.m. – Wrap-Up

Registration

There is no cost to attend the tour or lunch, but we need an accurate meal count.

Please contact Bob Whitney at 979-571-2086 to register.

Registration begins at 9:30 a.m. at New Deal Grain in New Deal, Texas, and we will leave for the field tour promptly at 10:00 a.m.

A Pesticide Was Detected—What Does That Mean for My Organic Crop?

A pesticide residue detected on an organic crop does not automatically mean loss of certification. The pesticide, residue level, crop, possible source and production records all determine what happens next.

We are right in the middle of the growing season, which also means that many certified organic farmers are receiving their annual organic inspection. During some inspections, the inspector may collect plant tissue, harvested grain, fruit, vegetables, soil, water or another sample and send it to a laboratory for pesticide residue testing.

A farmer operates machinery on a green field with a red tractor while a hose runs along a dirt path between large farming equipment.

Then the farmer receives a message saying, “A pesticide residue was detected.”

Those words can create some immediate panic! However, a pesticide detection does not automatically mean that your farm has lost organic certification or that you intentionally applied a prohibited pesticide. There is a process that the organic certifier must follow to determine what was detected, how much was found and where it may have come from.

Use Only Products Approved by Your Certifier

Let me start with the most important reminder: every material used on a certified organic farm should be approved by your certifier before it is applied. This includes pesticides, fertilizers, seed treatments, biological products, soil amendments, adjuvants, surfactants and even products used to clean equipment that may contact an organic crop. An OMRI listing is very helpful, but an OMRI-listed product should still be submitted to your certifier and included in your Organic System Plan before use. USDA states that all substances used on an organic operation must be approved by the operation’s certifying agent before use.

There are several reasons for this:

  • The product may only be allowed for certain uses.
  • The label formulation may have changed.
  • A product with a similar name may not be the same formulation.
  • The certifier may need to verify active and inactive ingredients.
  • Some allowed pesticides can only be used after preventive, cultural and biological controls have been documented.

My advice is simple: do not depend only on the OMRI logo on the container. Send the complete product label to your certifier and get written approval before application.

Why Are Organic Farms Tested?

A woman in a sun hat and gloves inspects cotton plants in a field, holding a leaf sample in a bag marked for pesticide residue analysis. A clipboard with inspection forms is beside her, and text above reads '5% of Operations Sampled'.

USDA requires organic certifiers to sample and test products from at least 5 percent of the operations they certify each year. A certifier with fewer than 30 certified operations must test at least one operation annually.

The certifier may select farms:

  • randomly;
  • because they produce a large volume of organic products;
  • because the crop or location presents a higher contamination risk;
  • because of a complaint or suspected problem; or
  • as part of an investigation.

Being selected for testing does not mean that the farmer is accused of wrongdoing. Testing is a normal part of protecting the integrity of the organic label. The certifier pays for this required periodic testing, and the sample must be collected by an authorized inspector, maintained under a proper chain of custody and analyzed by an accredited laboratory.

What Happens When Nothing Is Detected?

The easiest result is “not detected.” This means that the laboratory did not find any of the pesticides included in the laboratory screen above the method’s reporting limit. Remember that “not detected” does not necessarily mean that absolutely zero molecules were present. It means that the laboratory did not detect the pesticide at or above the level the test could reliably identify and report. A report may show glyphosate at >0.01 ppm which means it is there and detectable but at very low levels.

What Happens When a Pesticide Is Detected?

Remember you are in a farming area and pesticide residues can sometimes come from:

  • spray drift from a neighboring field;
  • contaminated irrigation water (especially in rice country);
  • contaminated harvest or transportation equipment;
  • inadequate cleanout of storage bins;
  • commingling during handling;
  • residues remaining from earlier land use; or
  • an input that contained an ingredient not disclosed on the label.

The certifier must consider the pesticide, the amount detected, the crop tested and the available production records.

The 0.01 ppm—or 10 Parts per Billion—Decision Point

NOP guidance identifies 0.01 parts per million, or 10 parts per billion, as an important decision point. A concentration of 0.01 ppm is extremely small. It is roughly comparable to one second in a little more than three years. Modern laboratories can detect some pesticides at very low concentrations, which is why a laboratory may find a residue even when the farmer did not intentionally apply that pesticide.

Illustration explaining what 10 parts per billion (ppb) looks like, featuring a farmer in a field, visualizing a small amount of particles under a magnifying glass, and providing context on the significance of this measurement in organic production.

When a prohibited pesticide is detected at or above 0.01 ppm, the certifier first determines whether EPA has established a legal tolerance for that pesticide on the particular crop or commodity tested.

That crop-specific detail is important. A pesticide may have:

  • one tolerance on cottonseed;
  • a different tolerance on corn;
  • another tolerance on vegetables; or
  • no legal tolerance at all on a particular crop (a pesticide is detected but one that is not for the crop being tested. I had an organic hay producer with a detected potato fungicide on the crop. Where did that come from?).

What Is an EPA Pesticide Tolerance?

An EPA tolerance is the maximum amount of a pesticide residue that may legally remain in or on a food or agricultural commodity. This is primarily a conventional pesticide and food-safety standard. It is not an organic pesticide allowance. The organic regulations use 5 percent of the EPA tolerance as the level at which an affected product must be excluded from organic sale.

For example, suppose EPA has established a tolerance of 1.0 ppm for a particular pesticide on a particular crop.

Five percent of that tolerance would be: 1.0 ppm times 0.05 = 0.05 ppm

The organic exclusion threshold would therefore be 0.05 ppm, or 50 parts per billion. This example means that if a residue is found in testing your crop that is greater than 0.05 ppm your crop cannot be sold as organic and you will get a notice of noncompliance.

Below 5 Percent of the EPA Tolerance

When the residue is at or below 5 percent of the EPA tolerance, the crop is not automatically excluded from organic sale solely because of the residue level.

However, the certifier may still investigate:

  • whether the farmer applied the pesticide;
  • whether spray drift occurred;
  • whether buffers were adequate;
  • whether shared equipment was properly cleaned;
  • whether storage and transportation protected the organic crop; and
  • whether the farmer followed the approved Organic System Plan.

If the farmer did not apply the pesticide and had reasonable preventive practices in place, the result may represent unavoidable contamination rather than a violation by the farmer. The certifier may still require corrective action. For example, the farmer may need to increase a buffer, improve equipment-cleaning records, communicate with a neighboring applicator or change how the harvested crop is stored.

Above 5 Percent of the EPA Tolerance

When testing detects a prohibited pesticide at a level greater than 5 percent of EPA’s tolerance for that pesticide on that commodity, the affected agricultural product cannot be sold, labeled or represented as organic. This does not necessarily mean that the entire farm immediately loses certification.

The certifier must determine what product the sample represents. Depending on the circumstances, the affected product could be:

  • one field;
  • one harvest lot;
  • one bin;
  • one truckload;
  • one storage unit; or
  • a larger quantity that was commingled.

Good field, harvest and storage records become extremely important. If a farmer can clearly show which field supplied each lot or bin, the certifier may be able to limit the problem to the affected product. When records are incomplete and several fields or loads have been mixed together, it may be difficult to separate the contaminated product from the rest of the crop.

What if There Is No EPA Tolerance?

Sometimes a laboratory detects a pesticide for which EPA has not established a tolerance on the tested crop. If there is no EPA tolerance and no applicable FDA action level, NOP guidance says that a prohibited pesticide residue above 0.01 ppm generally results in the affected product being excluded from organic sale. The certifier must also determine whether the result should be reported to EPA, FDA or the appropriate state agency. This is one reason that the name of the pesticide and the crop tested are just as important as the amount detected.

What if the Farmer Applied the Pesticide?

A drone flying above a field with a person in a safety vest observing in the foreground.

The 5-percent threshold does not create permission to use a prohibited pesticide. If an investigation shows that a prohibited pesticide was intentionally applied, the farmer may be out of compliance even when the residue detected is very low.

The certifier may consider:

  • exclusion of the affected crop from organic sale;
  • a notice of noncompliance;
  • suspension or revocation of certification; and
  • whether the field must complete a new 36-month transition period.

The basic organic requirement remains that prohibited substances cannot be applied to land during the 36 months before harvesting an organic crop. The residue level helps determine what happens to the product, but the investigation determines whether prohibited use occurred.

What Should a Farmer Do After Receiving a Positive Result?

First, do not panic—but do respond promptly.

I would recommend that the farmer:

  1. Ask for the complete laboratory report.
  2. Confirm the pesticide that was detected.
  3. Confirm the concentration in ppm or ppb.
  4. Ask whether EPA has a tolerance for that pesticide on the tested crop.
  5. Review all input and application records.
  6. Review neighboring pesticide applications and any drift concerns.
  7. Review equipment cleanout, harvest, storage and transportation records.
  8. Identify exactly which field, lot, bin or load the sample represents.
  9. Provide the certifier with any information that could help identify the source.
  10. Document corrective actions that may prevent another occurrence.

Do not immediately assume that a neighboring farmer caused the detection. The location of the sample, pesticide chemistry, timing of nearby applications, weather, field pattern and other evidence should be considered before reaching that conclusion.

Finally, a positive test may begin an investigation, but good practices and good records help tell the complete story.

More Resources

  • USDA Memo to Certifiers: Periodic Residue Testing of Organic Products. (AMS)
  • USDA NOP 2613: Responding to Results from Pesticide Residue Testing. (AMS)
  • USDA Organic Regulations, §§ 205.670–205.671. (eCFR)

TAMZ107 Stands Out in a Wet Year for Corn Ear Rots

A wet 2026 Texas corn trial highlighted TAMZ107’s strong ear-rot resistance, showing how years of public plant breeding can deliver disease protection directly through the seed.

Sometimes two ears of corn can tell an important plant-breeding story.

Two ears of corn stacked horizontally, showing yellow kernels with visible husk and root remnants.

Ears from the 2026 Taylor, Texas, corn hybrid trial. TAMZ107 (top) remained free of visible ear-rot symptoms, while an unnamed commercial hybrid (bottom) showed severe ear-rot damage.

Both ears pictured came from a 2026 corn hybrid trial near Taylor, Texas—one location in our multilocation testing program. The ear on top is TAMZ107, developed by Dr. Wenwei Xu, Texas A&M AgriLife Research corn breeder at Lubbock. The ear on bottom is an unnamed commercial hybrid.

Frequent rainfall and humid conditions during the 2026 growing season have favored corn ear rots across parts of Texas. The commercial ear shows severe ear-rot symptoms, with Fusarium among the predominant ear-rot pathogens observed this season. All commercial hybrids in this trial showed some ear-rot damage, while the TAMZ hybrids remained free of visible symptoms.

The importance of this comparison is not the identity of the commercial company. It is the value of years of public plant breeding. Dr. Xu selected resistant inbred parents and combined them to produce TAMZ hybrids adapted to Texas conditions. TAMZ107 has been tested for several years and is now ready for release and fits an organic program because it is GMO free and adapted to organic conditions.

Genetic resistance is especially valuable for organic farmers because it arrives in the seed. The plant begins the season with its own protection rather than depending on a treatment after disease develops. Resistant hybrids can also benefit any farmer facing difficult weather and disease pressure.

Image of AMZ 107 corn hybrid plants showing tall green stalks and developing ears of corn in a field.

See the TAMZ Hybrids in the Field

The TAMZ hybrids will be featured during the Field to Fiesta Corn Tour on Wednesday, August 12, beginning at 9 a.m. at the Halfway Research Center in Halfway, Texas. The tour will include the research center and nearby farm fields, followed by a sponsored lunch.

Topics will include heat during pollination, corn borers and earworms, drought tolerance, ear rots and herbicide drift. For attendance information, contact Extension Agronomist Kristie Keys at kristie.keys@ag.tamu.edu. View the program announcement.