2026 Organic Cotton Market Summary

Production Holds Steady, but the Market Is Shifting

USDA Agricultural Marketing Service has released its 2026 Organic Cotton Market Summary for the 2025 marketing year, and this year’s report tells a somewhat different story than the one we saw a year ago.

Last year’s report showed a substantial rebound in U.S. organic cotton production, with the 2024 crop reaching 56,717 bales, an increase of more than 17,000 bales from 2023.

For 2025, production increased again—but only slightly.

Table of Contents

Organic Cotton Production

U.S. production of organic Upland and American Pima cotton totaled 57,802 bales in 2025, an increase of just 1,085 bales, or about 1.9%, from 2024.

An additional 1,015 bales of transitional cotton were reported, down from 1,201 bales the previous year.

Texas continues to lead the nation in organic cotton planting and production, with additional organic acreage in Arizona, California and New Mexico.

The production numbers are important because they suggest that the large rebound we saw in 2024 did not continue at the same pace. Organic cotton production essentially leveled off in 2025.

Organic Cottonseed Remains Valuable

Organic cottonseed continues to be an important part of the value of the crop.

USDA reported organic cottonseed prices ranging from $385 to $660 per ton, compared with only $215 to $350 per ton for conventional cottonseed. Cottonseed yields ranged from 500 to 897 pounds of seed per bale of lint.

Most organic cottonseed continues to move into the organic dairy industry, with smaller amounts retained for oil production and livestock feed.

That relationship between Texas organic cotton and organic dairy remains important. Cotton is not simply producing lint for the textile market; the seed is also supplying a valuable certified organic livestock feed ingredient.

The 2026 Crop May Be Telling Us More About the Market

For me, the most interesting part of this year’s report may actually be USDA’s comments about the 2026 crop outlook.

Timely August rainfall helped relieve heat stress, although some fields were lost to hail and excessive heat. USDA also reports that overall organic cotton acreage was lower, in part because of crop rotations.

But one sentence especially stands out:

“Organic Upland acreage declined as growers shifted toward stronger organic Pima contract opportunities.”

USDA also reports that organic cotton demand remains “light amid strong global competition.”

Those two statements probably tell us more about the current organic cotton market than the modest increase in 2025 production.

Growers respond to markets. If contracts and premiums are stronger for organic Pima cotton than for organic Upland cotton, acreage will naturally begin moving in that direction where production conditions allow it.

At the same time, continued global competition is putting pressure on the U.S. organic cotton market.

My Take

A year ago, the big story was the recovery in organic cotton production. This year, I think the story is stability combined with change underneath the numbers.

Production increased from 56,717 to 57,802 bales, but that is essentially a flat year compared with the dramatic increase we saw in 2024. Meanwhile, transitional production declined, organic Upland acreage is reportedly falling, growers are responding to better Pima opportunities, and USDA continues to describe demand as light.

For Texas organic cotton growers, that makes contracts and market signals increasingly important. Producing organic cotton is expensive, especially when we consider weed control, rotations, fertility, seed availability and the additional management required under organic production. Acreage is unlikely to expand simply because organic cotton can be grown. There has to be a market willing to pay for it.

Texas remains the center of U.S. organic cotton production, but where that production goes—Upland versus Pima and perhaps even cotton versus other rotational crops—will increasingly depend on those market opportunities.

More Information

USDA AMS – 2026 Organic Cotton Market Summary
View the August 2026 USDA Organic Cotton Market Summary

Last Year’s Texas A&M AgriLife Organic Summary
2025 Organic Cotton Market Summary

Texas Organic Experience Comes to the National Organic Standards Board

USDA has announced five new appointments to the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), and one of those appointments is especially important for Texas organic agriculture: Jed Murray of Texas.

For many people outside Texas, Jed may be known today as Director of Government Relations for the Texas International Produce Association. But for those of us who have worked in Texas organic agriculture, there is much more to the story.

Jed has actually been part of Texas organic agriculture. He has grown organic vegetables, packed and marketed them, worked with retailers, advocated for growers, and helped us explore how Texas-grown organic products could reach larger markets.

I have known Jed for many years, and he has consistently supported Texas organic growers and efforts to expand opportunities for organic agriculture. He brings to the NOSB practical experience with what it takes to make organic agriculture work from the field all the way to the consumer.

Why the National Organic Standards Board Matters

The NOSB is not simply another USDA advisory committee.

Congress established the 15-member board under the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 to advise the Secretary of Agriculture on organic standards and, particularly, on substances used in organic production and handling. USDA appointed Jed to one of the board’s Public Interest/Consumer Interest Group seats for a five-year term through January 2031.

The NOSB deals with issues that eventually become very practical decisions on organic farms and in organic businesses.

The board reviews substances petitioned for addition to or removal from the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances, conducts the five-year sunset review of materials already on that list, and develops recommendations concerning organic production, handling and policy. Since its establishment, the NOSB has made more than 600 recommendations to USDA.

For an organic farmer or handler, these decisions can determine whether a fertilizer, pesticide, livestock health product, sanitizer, processing aid or other material can be used—and sometimes the specific restrictions placed on its use. Changes to the National List ultimately occur through USDA rulemaking following NOSB recommendations.

In other words, discussions at the NOSB can eventually affect what happens in a Texas organic field, greenhouse, packing shed, dairy, feed mill or processing facility.

Jed Brings More Than an Interest in Organic Agriculture

USDA’s announcement notes that Jed has 20 years of agricultural experience, including 13 years in the vegetable industry. He currently serves as Director of Government Relations for the Texas International Produce Association and Managing Partner of 9 Kids Compost LLC. His involvement also includes the Texas Department of State Health Services Food Safety and Defense Task Force, Texas Vegetable Association and the Texas A&M Vegetable & Fruit Program.

Those credentials are impressive, but they don’t fully explain why his appointment should matter to Texas organic growers.

Jed was an owner and partner in Tenaza Organics in South Texas, where he was directly involved in commercial certified-organic vegetable production. Tenaza produced crops such as parsley, broccoli, beets, spinach, Swiss chard, kale and cabbage and supplied large retailers and restaurants throughout Texas, with some production moving into export markets.

That means Jed understands organic agriculture from the production side—not simply from meetings, policy discussions or reports.

He knows what it means to plant an organic crop, deal with weather and production risk, manage a highly perishable product, meet buyer expectations, maintain organic integrity and then find a market willing to pay for what was produced.

Organic Farming in the Real World

South Texas agriculture can also provide some hard lessons.

Jed and Tenaza experienced firsthand the devastating February 2021 freeze. A year later, he described how the farm had been doing well before suddenly losing essentially its crop during the freeze. I was there in the summer of 2021 and Jed’s crew was working overtime to plant more crops to make up the losses.

Experiences like that give a person a different understanding of agricultural policy.

Organic standards have to protect the integrity of the organic label, but they also have to function on real farms facing drought, freezes, hurricanes, insects, diseases, labor challenges, market changes and the thousand other things agriculture can throw at a producer.

I believe that practical agricultural perspective is particularly valuable on the NOSB.

He Has Already Helped Shape Texas Organic Agriculture

Jed’s involvement with Texas organics has extended well beyond his own farm.

When Texas A&M AgriLife began a project in 2022 to examine opportunities for expanding markets for Texas-grown organic produce, Jed was an important industry collaborator.

At the time, I described him as an avid organic grower, a member of the Texas Department of Agriculture Organic Advisory Board, and an exemplary cooperator with AgriLife Extension. He also provided ideas about opportunities for exporting Texas organic produce.

The TDA Organic Agricultural Industry Advisory Board has an important mission of its own: helping the Commissioner of Agriculture assess, develop, promote and expand the Texas organic agricultural products industry.

So Jed’s new national role follows years of engagement with many of the same questions here in Texas: How do we protect organic integrity while also helping organic agriculture grow? How do we connect farmers with markets? How do regulations affect producers? And how do we maintain consumer confidence in the organic label?

Recognized for Leadership in the Produce Industry

Jed’s work has also been recognized beyond Texas organic circles.

In 2022, American Vegetable Grower selected Tenaza Organics as its Central Region Grower Achievement Award winner. The recognition highlighted not only the farm’s production but Jed’s advocacy for fresh produce, growers, agricultural education and Texas-grown products.

His produce-industry experience also gives him an understanding of the entire organic supply chain—from the farmer to the consumer.

Organic agriculture begins with production practices, but USDA Organic is ultimately a consumer-facing label operating within a federal regulatory system. Maintaining that label requires understanding farmers and handlers while never losing sight of the consumer trust on which the entire organic market depends.

Jed’s experience in production, marketing and public policy gives him insight into each part of that chain.

USDA is getting someone with national produce-industry experience. Those of us in Texas organic agriculture know it is also getting someone who has been in the organic field, worked with organic growers, helped market organic crops and supported the growth of our organic industry for many years.

I am very pleased to see Jed Murray take that experience to the National Organic Standards Board!

More Resources

USDA Announces Five New Members to the National Organic Standards Board
USDA’s announcement and biography of Jed Murray.
Read the USDA announcement

National Organic Standards Board
Background on NOSB membership, responsibilities, meetings and activities.
USDA National Organic Standards Board

NOSB Recommendations
More than 600 recommendations involving organic production practices and materials are available through USDA.
View NOSB recommendations

National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances
Learn how substances are evaluated and regulated for organic crop, livestock and handling operations.
USDA National List information

Helping Expand the Market for Texas-Grown Organic Produce
Texas A&M AgriLife’s 2022 look at expanding domestic and international opportunities for Texas organic produce, including Jed’s involvement.
Read the AgriLife Today article

Tenaza Organics – Grower Achievement Award Regional Winner
A look at Tenaza Organics, its crops, markets and Jed’s work promoting produce and Texas growers.
Read the Growing Produce article

Organic Variety Production Tour – Thursday, September 3rd

New Deal, Texas | Registration begins at 9:30 a.m. | No registration fee

One of the continuing challenges for organic crop producers is finding seed varieties developed for the conditions in which we actually farm. This is especially true in the Texas High Plains, where crops must perform under heat, limited rainfall, declining irrigation capacity, organic fertility programs, and significant insect and disease pressure.

On Thursday, September 3, we will hold an Organic Variety Production Tour in the New Deal–Lubbock area to look at efforts underway to address that problem. This tour is built around a Southern SARE Producer Grant led by Seth Fortenberry of New Deal Grain that is helping develop local capacity to produce and supply non-GMO hybrid corn seed for organic and water-limited cropping systems.

Seth farms organic crops in the Texas High Plains and operates New Deal Grain, an organic grain and seed business. One of the problems he and other organic growers continue to face is the limited availability of non-GMO corn hybrids adapted to the hot, dry conditions of our region. Most corn seed production and much of the breeding work supplying non-GMO hybrids has historically been centered in the Midwest. The goal of this project is to begin closing that gap by taking regionally adapted genetics, producing the seed locally, and ultimately making those hybrids available to organic farmers.

New Deal Grain has licensed TAMZ106B and TAMZ107, two non-GMO corn hybrids developed through the Texas A&M AgriLife corn breeding program. The SARE project is helping Seth build the specialized knowledge and infrastructure needed to increase parent seed, produce hybrid seed, maintain genetic purity, process and condition the harvested seed, and move that seed into commercial production. The project also includes testing these hybrids on certified organic farms and comparing their performance under actual production conditions.

The September tour will use that corn seed project as a starting point, but the discussion will be broader. We will look at corn, sorghum, cowpea and guar plots and talk about what characteristics we need when selecting and developing varieties for organic agriculture. That may include yield, drought and heat tolerance, disease and insect resistance, weed competitiveness, forage quality, food quality, seed production characteristics, and opportunities for alternative markets.

At the Texas Tech corn plots, we will discuss corn breeding, promising crosses, commercial possibilities, and high-anthocyanin or High-A corn being developed for specialty food and health-oriented markets. We will then move to cowpea and guar plots to discuss their potential as cover crops, forage crops, protein crops, and alternative cash crops. The final field discussion will focus on organic sorghum, including variety needs, seed availability, and where we see opportunities for the organic sorghum industry.

This is really a tour about connecting plant breeding, seed production, and farmer needs. Developing a good variety is only the first step. Farmers also need enough high-quality seed, produced and conditioned correctly, at a price and quantity that allows them to actually plant it. Building that connection from the breeder’s plot to the farmer’s planter is one of the important long-term goals of this work.

Tentative Tour Agenda

9:30–10:00 a.m. – Registration, Introductions and Tour Overview at
New Deal Grain – Bob Whitney, Extension Organic Specialist and Seth Fortenberry, New Deal Grain

10:00 a.m. – Depart for Texas Tech Farm – Corn Plots

10:15 a.m. – Corn Breeding and Variety Development
Overview of the corn breeding program, varieties and crosses, potential industry uses, and High-A corn. Andrew Sellers, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Corn Breeding Technician and Bob Whitney

10:45 a.m. – Depart for Sorghum, Cowpea and Guar Plots

10:55 a.m. – Field Overview – Seth Fortenberry

11:00 a.m. – Organic Cowpea and Guar
Discussion of the plots and their potential as cover crops, protein crops, forage crops, and alternative crops for organic production – Dr. Waltram Ravelombola, Assistant Professor, Organic & Specialty Crop Breeding

11:25 a.m. – Organic Sorghum
Sorghum plot discussion, organic sorghum production and variety development, seed needs, and the future of organic sorghum – Dr. Bill Rooney, Professor, Sorghum Crop Breeder and Nick Porter, Senior Research Associate, Sorghum Breeding

12:00 noon – Depart for Lunch at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Lubbock
Lunch provided by Orlando’s

12:45 p.m. – Wrap-Up

Registration

There is no cost to attend the tour or lunch, but we need an accurate meal count.

Please contact Bob Whitney at 979-571-2086 to register.

Registration begins at 9:30 a.m. at New Deal Grain in New Deal, Texas, and we will leave for the field tour promptly at 10:00 a.m.

One Common Organic System Plan for Everyone – Maybe?

The introduction of a Common Organic System Plan, or Common OSP, is an important step toward greater consistency within the National Organic Program. Certified organic operations are all working under the same federal organic regulations, but they have often been required to describe their farms, handling systems, materials, and recordkeeping practices on forms that differ substantially from one certifier to another.

Right now, a person new to organic has to pick a certifier first and get their version of an OSP before I or other educators can even talk about how to use an OSP. A common format can reduce that unnecessary variation by creating a standard way to organize the information every certifier needs. It may also improve portability by allowing an operation to maintain one working OSP that can be updated over time and, when necessary, more easily submitted to another certifier without rebuilding the entire plan in a different format. A common complaint I hear is, “I would change certifiers but relearning and reworking all the forms is a mountain I don’t want to climb!”

A Common OSP can also make education and technical assistance much more effective. Extension educators, mentors, consultants, and farmer organizations can teach producers how an OSP works using one nationally recognized structure rather than trying to explain several certifier-specific systems. Certified operations interested in using the Common OSP should begin by asking their certifier whether it is accepted for new applications, annual updates, or transfers, and whether any supplemental forms are required. Producers should also ask whether the certifier will accept the Common OSP as the primary plan or require the same information to be entered again into a separate portal. I know that CCOF is not planning to use the new forms or recognize them for their clients since they say their forms save time. Many other certifiers will provide an option to their clients.

This new OSP is simply labeled as Version No. 1 and being the first it will probably be changed or updated over time.

Fortunately, No. 1 has started a conversation that will help determine whether a Common OSP truly reduces paperwork and gives the producer greater ownership of the document that describes how the organic operation maintains compliance.

I encourage you to take a look at the new No. 1 Common OSP. Below is the link to the USDA Website where you can download everything you need.

USDA Common OSP Forms

Can You Grow a Sweetclover in Far West Texas?

Currently the Texas organic program has several producers farming in Far West Texas working with soils that have a high pH and some salt and sodium concerns. Their irrigation water also carries moderate levels of salts and sodium. These are not unusual conditions in Far West Texas, but they complicate crop selection. Over time, sodium can weaken soil aggregation, reduce water infiltration, and make it more difficult for roots to explore the soil. Salinity adds another stress because plants must use more energy to extract water from the soil. The goal is to continue to find and grow crops that can not only help the bottom line but add to soil fertility and overall soil health. That is a lot to ask of any crop but especially a sweetclover crop!

Hubam Sweetclover is a Surprise Crop

Hubam is an annual white sweetclover. It is a legume, which means it can form a relationship with nitrogen-fixing bacteria and obtain much of its nitrogen from the atmosphere rather than from purchased fertilizer. That is valuable in an organic farming system, but nitrogen fixation is only part of the story.

Sweetclover develops a strong taproot that can explore deeper portions of the soil profile. Those roots create channels, add organic matter below the soil surface, and help move carbon deeper into the soil. When the roots eventually die, the channels remain available for water movement, air exchange, soil organisms, and the roots of future crops. This “biological tillage” provides a living root that opens the soil while also feeding microbes, adding carbon, and protecting the surface. Also, Hubam has a history of performing on alkaline soils and even doing so with some salt and sodium problems.

Recently, I was out in Far West Texas and got a chance to see my first field of Hubam Sweetclover and was surprised by the 5 to even 6 feet tall plants, heavily branched, and still productive even though it was the end of July and the crop was seeded out and going down. This is normal for a cool season clover, still the crop was demonstrating that an annual white sweetclover could survive and produce substantial forage and root mass even under some tough soil and water conditions. It is known to be about the most heat tolerant of all the clovers and as you can see will be growing and blooming late into summer. One source said it can get 10′ tall!

Can all that Hubam Sweetclover seed be harvested??

You can easily see from the picture that Hubam Sweetclover produces a lot of seed and is known for reseeding itself because of its good viable seed production. Unfortunately harvesting that seed for future use in other fields may be a real challenge. First, all sweetclover plants are indeterminate. That means the plant does not flower, mature, and dry down all at once. On the same plant you can see white flowers, green pods, mature brown pods, green stems, and drying stems which creates a harvest problem, when do you start? When the oldest seed is mature enough to harvest, the newest seed may still be immature. Waiting for the entire plant to mature increases the risk that the earliest, most mature seed will shatter and fall to the ground. Cutting earlier protects some of the mature seed but potentially leaves more immature seed in the windrow.

The crop is also tall and tangled. The large stems can remain green longer than the fine branches and seed pods. A combine may thresh dry seed but stall out processing heavy, moist stems. Swathing was recommended by most of the seedsmen I contacted. Darcy Turner at Turner Seed has decades of experience and he recommended swathing at about 50% dark brown to black seed. You can run a conventional swather, but the crimpers need to be open as wide as possible to minimize crushing and pod disturbance. We sure don’t want to strip off the seed with a crimper. Your combine needs a pickup attachment, but they are not too hard to find especially around any silage crop growers.

Lastly, you may be wondering if there is any problem with harvesting the seed to use either on your own farm or to sell to your neighbor – don’t worry it is not a protected variety and has been around for decades.

If You’re not into Seed Harvest, then What?

Talking with the Far West Texas farmers they like the Hubam Sweetclover but the seed is very hard to find – probably because it is so hard to harvest! That said we did discuss another variety developed because it was similar to Hubam but had some different or even better plant characteristics.

Silver River1 was developed and released through Texas A&M AgriLife Research. and is described in the Journal of Plant Registrations, Volume 11, Issue 2, pages 112–115.2 It is closely related in function and growth habit to Hubam and was selected primarily for resistance to sweetclover rust, a disease that can severely damage susceptible sweetclover plants. Published evaluations found Silver River to be similar to Hubam in maturity and forage production while having much greater rust resistance.

Rust may not be the first concern that comes to mind in the dry environment around Pecos. However, irrigation and a dense crop canopy can create humid conditions within the stand. Disease resistance is rarely a disadvantage, even when disease pressure is inconsistent. More importantly, Silver River may provide many of the same soil-building and forage functions as Hubam while being more available through several commercial seed sources. We haven’t tried it in Far West Texas yet but overall it has the potential and genetics to do really well – try a test plot and see.

Sweetclover as Hay

Both Hubam and Silver River can produce substantial forage, but sweetclover should not be managed exactly like alfalfa. As sweetclover matures, the main stems become large and woody. For hay, cutting time is critical and like other legumes earlier cutting generally provides better forage quality and finer stems, but it sacrifices some total tonnage and even root development. Later cutting produces more biomass but also increases stem size, slows drying, and reduces forage quality.

Sweetclover also requires special attention during curing since moldy sweetclover hay can develop dicoumarol, an anticoagulant associated with sweetclover bleeding disease in livestock. This risk comes from improperly cured or mold-damaged hay rather than from healthy plants standing in the field. Grazing is their strong suit, but they can be cut for hay and cattle love it!

  1. Silver River Annual Sweetclover ↩︎
  2. Registration of ‘Silver River’ Sweetclover ↩︎

A Pesticide Was Detected—What Does That Mean for My Organic Crop?

We are right in the middle of the growing season, which also means that many certified organic farmers are receiving their annual organic inspection. During some inspections, the inspector may collect plant tissue, harvested grain, fruit, vegetables, soil, water or another sample and send it to a laboratory for pesticide residue testing.

Then the farmer receives a message saying, “A pesticide residue was detected.”

Those words can create some immediate panic! However, a pesticide detection does not automatically mean that your farm has lost organic certification or that you intentionally applied a prohibited pesticide. There is a process that the organic certifier must follow to determine what was detected, how much was found and where it may have come from.

Use Only Products Approved by Your Certifier

Let me start with the most important reminder: every material used on a certified organic farm should be approved by your certifier before it is applied. This includes pesticides, fertilizers, seed treatments, biological products, soil amendments, adjuvants, surfactants and even products used to clean equipment that may contact an organic crop. An OMRI listing is very helpful, but an OMRI-listed product should still be submitted to your certifier and included in your Organic System Plan before use. USDA states that all substances used on an organic operation must be approved by the operation’s certifying agent before use.

There are several reasons for this:

  • The product may only be allowed for certain uses.
  • The label formulation may have changed.
  • A product with a similar name may not be the same formulation.
  • The certifier may need to verify active and inactive ingredients.
  • Some allowed pesticides can only be used after preventive, cultural and biological controls have been documented.

My advice is simple: do not depend only on the OMRI logo on the container. Send the complete product label to your certifier and get written approval before application.

Why Are Organic Farms Tested?

USDA requires organic certifiers to sample and test products from at least 5 percent of the operations they certify each year. A certifier with fewer than 30 certified operations must test at least one operation annually.

The certifier may select farms:

  • randomly;
  • because they produce a large volume of organic products;
  • because the crop or location presents a higher contamination risk;
  • because of a complaint or suspected problem; or
  • as part of an investigation.

Being selected for testing does not mean that the farmer is accused of wrongdoing. Testing is a normal part of protecting the integrity of the organic label. The certifier pays for this required periodic testing, and the sample must be collected by an authorized inspector, maintained under a proper chain of custody and analyzed by an accredited laboratory.

What Happens When Nothing Is Detected?

The easiest result is “not detected.” This means that the laboratory did not find any of the pesticides included in the laboratory screen above the method’s reporting limit. Remember that “not detected” does not necessarily mean that absolutely zero molecules were present. It means that the laboratory did not detect the pesticide at or above the level the test could reliably identify and report. A report may show glyphosate at >0.01 ppm which means it is there and detectable but at very low levels.

What Happens When a Pesticide Is Detected?

Remember you are in a farming area and pesticide residues can sometimes come from:

  • spray drift from a neighboring field;
  • contaminated irrigation water (especially in rice country);
  • contaminated harvest or transportation equipment;
  • inadequate cleanout of storage bins;
  • commingling during handling;
  • residues remaining from earlier land use; or
  • an input that contained an ingredient not disclosed on the label.

The certifier must consider the pesticide, the amount detected, the crop tested and the available production records.

The 0.01 ppm—or 10 Parts per Billion—Decision Point

NOP guidance identifies 0.01 parts per million, or 10 parts per billion, as an important decision point. A concentration of 0.01 ppm is extremely small. It is roughly comparable to one second in a little more than three years. Modern laboratories can detect some pesticides at very low concentrations, which is why a laboratory may find a residue even when the farmer did not intentionally apply that pesticide.

When a prohibited pesticide is detected at or above 0.01 ppm, the certifier first determines whether EPA has established a legal tolerance for that pesticide on the particular crop or commodity tested.

That crop-specific detail is important. A pesticide may have:

  • one tolerance on cottonseed;
  • a different tolerance on corn;
  • another tolerance on vegetables; or
  • no legal tolerance at all on a particular crop (a pesticide is detected but one that is not for the crop being tested. I had an organic hay producer with a detected potato fungicide on the crop. Where did that come from?).

What Is an EPA Pesticide Tolerance?

An EPA tolerance is the maximum amount of a pesticide residue that may legally remain in or on a food or agricultural commodity. This is primarily a conventional pesticide and food-safety standard. It is not an organic pesticide allowance. The organic regulations use 5 percent of the EPA tolerance as the level at which an affected product must be excluded from organic sale.

For example, suppose EPA has established a tolerance of 1.0 ppm for a particular pesticide on a particular crop.

Five percent of that tolerance would be: 1.0 ppm times 0.05 = 0.05 ppm

The organic exclusion threshold would therefore be 0.05 ppm, or 50 parts per billion. This example means that if a residue is found in testing your crop that is greater than 0.05 ppm your crop cannot be sold as organic and you will get a notice of noncompliance.

Below 5 Percent of the EPA Tolerance

When the residue is at or below 5 percent of the EPA tolerance, the crop is not automatically excluded from organic sale solely because of the residue level.

However, the certifier may still investigate:

  • whether the farmer applied the pesticide;
  • whether spray drift occurred;
  • whether buffers were adequate;
  • whether shared equipment was properly cleaned;
  • whether storage and transportation protected the organic crop; and
  • whether the farmer followed the approved Organic System Plan.

If the farmer did not apply the pesticide and had reasonable preventive practices in place, the result may represent unavoidable contamination rather than a violation by the farmer. The certifier may still require corrective action. For example, the farmer may need to increase a buffer, improve equipment-cleaning records, communicate with a neighboring applicator or change how the harvested crop is stored.

Above 5 Percent of the EPA Tolerance

When testing detects a prohibited pesticide at a level greater than 5 percent of EPA’s tolerance for that pesticide on that commodity, the affected agricultural product cannot be sold, labeled or represented as organic. This does not necessarily mean that the entire farm immediately loses certification.

The certifier must determine what product the sample represents. Depending on the circumstances, the affected product could be:

  • one field;
  • one harvest lot;
  • one bin;
  • one truckload;
  • one storage unit; or
  • a larger quantity that was commingled.

Good field, harvest and storage records become extremely important. If a farmer can clearly show which field supplied each lot or bin, the certifier may be able to limit the problem to the affected product. When records are incomplete and several fields or loads have been mixed together, it may be difficult to separate the contaminated product from the rest of the crop.

What if There Is No EPA Tolerance?

Sometimes a laboratory detects a pesticide for which EPA has not established a tolerance on the tested crop. If there is no EPA tolerance and no applicable FDA action level, NOP guidance says that a prohibited pesticide residue above 0.01 ppm generally results in the affected product being excluded from organic sale. The certifier must also determine whether the result should be reported to EPA, FDA or the appropriate state agency. This is one reason that the name of the pesticide and the crop tested are just as important as the amount detected.

What if the Farmer Applied the Pesticide?

The 5-percent threshold does not create permission to use a prohibited pesticide. If an investigation shows that a prohibited pesticide was intentionally applied, the farmer may be out of compliance even when the residue detected is very low.

The certifier may consider:

  • exclusion of the affected crop from organic sale;
  • a notice of noncompliance;
  • suspension or revocation of certification; and
  • whether the field must complete a new 36-month transition period.

The basic organic requirement remains that prohibited substances cannot be applied to land during the 36 months before harvesting an organic crop. The residue level helps determine what happens to the product, but the investigation determines whether prohibited use occurred.

What Should a Farmer Do After Receiving a Positive Result?

First, do not panic—but do respond promptly.

I would recommend that the farmer:

  1. Ask for the complete laboratory report.
  2. Confirm the pesticide that was detected.
  3. Confirm the concentration in ppm or ppb.
  4. Ask whether EPA has a tolerance for that pesticide on the tested crop.
  5. Review all input and application records.
  6. Review neighboring pesticide applications and any drift concerns.
  7. Review equipment cleanout, harvest, storage and transportation records.
  8. Identify exactly which field, lot, bin or load the sample represents.
  9. Provide the certifier with any information that could help identify the source.
  10. Document corrective actions that may prevent another occurrence.

Do not immediately assume that a neighboring farmer caused the detection. The location of the sample, pesticide chemistry, timing of nearby applications, weather, field pattern and other evidence should be considered before reaching that conclusion.

Finally, a positive test may begin an investigation, but good practices and good records help tell the complete story.

More Resources

  • USDA Memo to Certifiers: Periodic Residue Testing of Organic Products. (AMS)
  • USDA NOP 2613: Responding to Results from Pesticide Residue Testing. (AMS)
  • USDA Organic Regulations, §§ 205.670–205.671. (eCFR)