Organic Sorghum Seed Systems: From Plant Breeding to the Organic Farm

Organic sorghum begins long before planting. This publication looks at how plant breeding, seed quality, soil biology, organic production, and farmer testing work together to move better sorghum genetics from the breeding program to the organic farm.

This material is adapted from a presentation prepared for the 2026 Global Sorghum Conference, held September 14–18 in Lubbock, Texas. The Conference was hosted by Texas Tech University in partnership with the Global Sorghum Association and the conference brought together more than 400 participants from 20 countries. The next conference will be held in Australia in a few years, and I certainly hope to attend!

Close-up image of organic sorghum seeds with a textured background, accompanied by informative text about the importance of seeds in organic sorghum production.

Figure 1. Organic sorghum begins with genetics, but successful seed systems also depend on biological performance, agronomic adaptation, and market availability.

Organic Sorghum Starts With Seed

Sorghum fits organic agriculture particularly well. It is drought and heat adapted, works in rotations, and can serve grain, forage, livestock, and increasingly specialty food markets.

But there is a bottleneck.

The farmer can only plant the genetics that somebody is willing and able to put in a seed bag.

In my experience, organic sorghum seed availability has not kept pace with the need for regionally adapted genetics and greater seed choice.

So, when I say organic sorghum begins with seed, I mean that every successful crop begins long before the planter enters the field.

A presentation slide titled 'What Does an Organic Farmer Need From Sorghum Seed?' featuring three sections: 'Get Up,' 'Compete,' and 'Finish,' with key points on ideal sorghum seed characteristics. To the right, there is an image of young sorghum plants in biodegradable pots, highlighting healthy growth.

Figure 2. Organic sorghum varieties for organic production must establish rapidly, compete effectively, and finish with acceptable yield and grain quality.

What Does an Organic Farmer Need From Sorghum Seed?

I think about what an organic farmer needs from sorghum in three very simple stages.

First, it has to GET UP.

We need germination, vigor, rapid emergence, good coleoptile development, and strong early rooting. We do not have the same ability to compensate for weak establishment without seed treatments prohibited in organic production.

Second, it has to COMPETE.

Early growth, canopy development, rooting (fast and deep), nutrient acquisition, and weed competitiveness become part of our weed and fertility management system.

And then it has to FINISH.

It has to resist disease and insects, remain standing (no lodging), mature properly, produce quality grain, and ultimately yield.

The important distinction is this:

In an organic system, we often ask the plant to perform some of the functions that conventional agriculture asks inputs to perform.

Infographic detailing the impact of organic farming on microbial diversity and its significance for sorghum seed.

Figure 3. Seed enters an existing biological system shaped by soil, climate, cropping history, and management.

The Seed Enters a Biological System

There is another dimension that we are becoming increasingly interested in: biology.

In our long-term organic cotton and sorghum fields, we are documenting greater microbial diversity, increasingly structured microbial communities, and functional specialization over time.

We are also seeing microbial populations associated with nutrient mineralization, soil aggregation, plant–microbe interaction, and resilience to stress.

But I want to emphasize something important.

There does not appear to be one universal “organic microbiome.”

Instead, organic management seems to strengthen environmental selection. Each field develops a community influenced by its soil, climate, cropping history, and management.

Now introduce seed into that system.

The seed itself carries microorganisms.1 Those organisms enter a soil containing an already established microbial community, and different plant genotypes may interact differently with that biology.2

So one research question I think deserves much more attention is:

If the soil microbiome becomes locally adapted, should we also be considering the seed microbiome as part of crop adaptation? Testing, testing, testing!

Perhaps eventually we need to think beyond simply genotype by environment toward genotype × environment × microbiome × management.

A man in a cap examining sorghum plants in a greenhouse, with notes about breeding and selection for organic sorghum displayed alongside.

Figure 4. Organic sorghum breeding targets extend beyond yield to establishment, competition, resilience, harvestability, and market quality.

What Should We Breed and Select For in Organic Sorghum?

Earlier I showed you what the farmer needs from the plant. Now I want to turn those production needs into breeding targets.

I am not suggesting that yield becomes less important. Farmers are still paid for yield.

But the pathway to that yield may be different in an organic system.

For establishment, vigor, emergence, rooting, and seedling disease resistance may become especially valuable.

For competition, early biomass, canopy development, weed competitiveness, and nutrient capture matter.

For resilience, sorghum already gives us tremendous strengths in heat and drought tolerance, stay-green, disease resistance, and yield stability.

And ultimately we still need standability, uniform maturity, grain quality, and the end-use characteristics the market wants.

One additional question is plant–microbe recruitment. “Can we eventually identify or select sorghum that interacts particularly well with beneficial soil organisms?”

We cannot select effectively for an organic production system unless we actually observe phenotype under that production system. The genotype may look excellent on paper or in another environment, but we have to see how it expresses itself where nitrogen release is biological, weed competition is real, and seedling protection is limited.

We may need to put more selection pressure on traits that allow the plant to solve problems for itself.

Infographic titled 'Producing Organic Sorghum Seed: Protecting Purity and Performance' from Texas A&M Agrilife Extension. It outlines key practices for maintaining genetic purity, managing seed crops, and ensuring seed quality in sorghum seed production.

Figure 5. Organic seed production must protect genetic purity, crop performance, seed quality, and organic integrity.

Producing Organic Sorghum Seed: Protecting Purity and Performance

Once we identify the genetics we want, somebody still has to produce the seed.

And seed production is not grain production.

With grain, I am primarily concerned about what I harvest this year. With seed, I am responsible for what happens in somebody else’s field next year.

First, we protect genetic purity through field isolation, regularly rogueing any off-types, and managing pollen movement and flowering.

Second, we protect the seed crop.

Weed control during flowering and seed fill matters.

Fertility has to be synchronized with crop demand using organic sources.

Disease management becomes especially important, and establishment has to occur without the conventional synthetic seed treatments that may normally provide some protection.

Finally, we protect the seed at harvest. Timing, uniform maturity, weathering, and deterioration all affect the quality of what eventually goes into the seed bag.

So we are trying to preserve genetic identity, biological quality, and organic integrity simultaneously.

Infographic titled 'Organic Seed Quality Does Not End at Harvest', detailing physical, biological, and organic integrity factors related to seed quality after harvest. Includes icons representing harvesting, cleaning, conditioning, storing, testing, and bagging seeds.

Figure 6. Seed quality can be preserved or degraded at every step from harvest through cleaning, conditioning, storage, testing, and bagging.

Organic Seed Quality Does Not End at Harvest

Harvest does not finish seed production.

In fact, every step shown here can either preserve seed quality or degrade it.

Harvest can mechanically damage seed through improper combine settings, augers, handling, and repeated drops.

Cleaning removes contaminants, but poorly adjusted equipment can also damage seed.

Conditioning or seed sizing influences uniformity and physical quality.

Storage conditions affect germination, vigor, and longevity, while insect management must remain compatible with organic requirements.

Testing tells us whether the seed still performs as expected.

Bagging must preserve lot identity, traceability, and certified organic integrity.

For organic seed there is an additional layer: equipment cleanliness, commingling prevention, lot identity, weed seed contamination, and documentation all matter.

And biologically, we increasingly need to think about seed health, seedborne pathogens, and perhaps what these processes are doing to the seed microbiome.

The field produces the seed, but post-harvest handling determines whether that seed reaches the farmer with its quality and integrity intact.

And this is where market integrity enters the seed system. Organic operates as an identity-preserved, documented production and handling system. The seed not only has to germinate; we must be able to document what it is, where it came from, and that its organic integrity was maintained.

Flowchart detailing TAMU Organic Breeding Programs, including on-farm organic trials for various crops, organic testing, farmer strips, regional testing, and seed increase.

Figure 7. Promising genetics should move progressively from breeding nurseries to organic testing, farmer strips, regional evaluation, and ultimately seed increase.

Test It Where It Will Be Grown

This may be the most practical recommendation I can give the breeding community.

Test promising material in the environment where you expect farmers to grow it.

At Texas A&M we are increasingly moving material from breeding programs into certified organic fields—not only sorghum, but wheat, corn, cotton, cowpea, guar, peanuts, and other crops.

The progression I would like to see become more routine is simple:

breeding nursery → organic testing → farmer strip → regional testing → seed increase.

We do not need every breeding program to become an organic breeding program.

But organic production should become one of the environments in which promising germplasm is evaluated.

Farmers also need to participate earlier. They see things in larger fields that we may never see in a small research plot—emergence problems, weed competitiveness, maturity differences, harvestability, and management interactions.

That farmer feedback should then move back into the breeding program.

Building Better Organic Sorghum Seed Systems

Better organic sorghum does not end with better genetics. The genetics must be evaluated under organic management, multiplied without losing purity or quality, handled carefully after harvest, and ultimately placed in the hands of farmers who can test them under real production conditions.

If we want organic sorghum production to grow, we cannot simply breed better sorghum. We must build better seed systems. That means breeders, agronomists, seed producers, organic farmers, researchers, certifiers, and markets working together to move useful genetics all the way from the breeding program to the farm.

References

  1. Johnston-Monje, D., J. P. Gutiérrez, and L. A. Becerra Lopez-Lavalle. 2021. “Seed-Transmitted Bacteria and Fungi Dominate Juvenile Plant Microbiomes.” Frontiers in Microbiology 12:737616. ↩︎
  2. Sanz-Puente, I., S. Redondo-Salvo, G. Torres-Cortés, M. de Toro, S. Fernandes, A. Börner, Ó. Lorenzo, F. de la Cruz, and M. Robledo. 2025. “Seed-mediated vertical transmission of Pantoea core endophytes.” The ISME Journal 19(1): wraf192. ↩︎
Text graphic featuring the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program, and Transition to Organic Partnership Program, with the USDA Organic logo.

Organic Sorghum Resources

Texas organic sorghum resources covering grain and forage varieties, seed sources, planting considerations, production information, and links to AgriLife variety trials and other management resources.

Sorghum’s natural characteristics and compatibility with organic farming principles indeed make it an excellent crop for organic cultivation. While some traits like drought tolerance and non-GMO status are shared with conventional sorghum, these characteristics synergize particularly well with the goals and methods of organic agriculture, offering distinct advantages.

Technical content last updated: September 11, 2026
This page is periodically updated as new Texas research, sorghum varieties, organic production information, markets, and seed sources become available.

Click a link below to scroll down!

Table of Contents

  • Drought Tolerance: Sorghum’s inherent drought tolerance makes it an ideal crop for organic systems, which prioritize water conservation and efficient use.
  • Low Fertilizer Needs: Sorghum’s ability to thrive in less fertile soils matches well with organic farming, which relies on natural fertility management rather than synthetic fertilizers.
  • Natural Resistance to Pests and Diseases: Sorghum’s inherent resistance to many pests and diseases minimizes the need for synthetic pesticides, making it easier for organic farmers to manage their crops.
  • Versatility in Use: Sorghum can be utilized in a variety of ways (grain, syrup, fodder) which allows organic producers to cater to diverse markets (food, feed, sweeteners) under organic labels.
  • Contribution to Soil Health: Sorghum’s deep rooting system can improve soil structure and increase water infiltration, beneficial effects that are particularly valued in organic systems focused on long-term soil health.
  • Crop Rotation and Diversity: Sorghum fits well into crop rotations, a cornerstone of organic farming, helping break pest and disease cycles and improving soil health without relying on chemical inputs.
  • Consumer Preference for Non-GMO: Even though there is no GMO sorghum on the market, the strong consumer preference for non-GMO products benefits organic sorghum producers, as their products are guaranteed to meet this demand.
  • Growing Demand for Organic Grains: The increasing consumer demand for organic products extends to grains, including sorghum, for both human consumption and organic animal feed.
  • Carbon Sequestration: Sorghum’s growth habit and biomass production can contribute to carbon sequestration, aligning with the environmental sustainability goals of organic farming.

While many of sorghum’s traits benefit both conventional and organic systems, its natural resilience, low input requirements, and versatility make it particularly well-suited for organic agriculture. These characteristics help organic sorghum producers minimize reliance on external inputs, align with organic principles, and tap into a growing market demand for organic products.

The number of seeds per pound in sorghum varieties can vary significantly depending on the specific variety and the size of the seeds. Generally, this range can be broad, reflecting differences in genetics, breeding objectives, and end use (grain, forage, or specialty types). Here’s a general overview:

  • Small-Seeded Varieties: Can have as many as 16,000 to 18,000 seeds per pound.
  • Large-Seeded Varieties: May have fewer seeds per pound, typically ranging from 12,000 to 15,000 seeds per pound.
  • Forage sorghums and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid types tend to have larger seeds compared to grain sorghum varieties. The seeds per pound can range from 10,000 to 14,000 for forage types, with sorghum-sudangrass hybrids often on the lower end of this scale due to their larger seed size.

The varieties listed below are some planted by current organic growers. We are in the process of getting a better list together and will post them here!

These varieties are listed along with their respective websites for more detailed information. Company listings are down below and your source for qualified salespeople. Check with your certifier before buying any sorghum seed especially if the variety is not sold as organically produced. Since we do not have many organic, locally adapted sorghum varieties producers typically buy conventionally produced varieties without seed treatments.

BH Genetics has non-GMO and untreated sorghum and corn seed available for organic growers. To check out the list: BH Genetics Untreated Seed List

Richardson Seeds

DynaGro Seed (Nutrien Ag Solutions)

MOJO Seed

Sorghum Partners, S&W Seed Company

Scott Seed Co

  • 114 E New York St. or PO Box 1732, Hereford, TX  79045
  • Office: 806-364-3484
  • Coby Kreighauser
  • Mobile: 806-683-1868
  • coby@scottseed.net
  • Chuck Cielencki
  • Mobile: 806-683-1868
  • chuck@scottseed.net

Supra Ag International

  • 10808 S River Front Pkwy, Suite 3039, South Jordan, UT 84095
  • Office: 801-984-6723
  • Sales: 806-292-0031
  • info@supra.ag
  • Chris Hendrickson
  • chris@supra.ag

Warner Seeds

Integra, Wilbur-Ellis

LG Seeds

Golden Acres

Innvictis Seed Solutions

Alta Seeds by Advanta

DeKalb (Bayer)

BH Genetics

You are special and everybody knows it!

Yes, if you are certified organic you are special and yes, everybody knows it or can know it! I have many, many opportunities to speak to groups about organic every year. I do my best to tell people that really don’t know about organic, what is involved in being certified organic, and then to describe the people who grow, process and sell organic products. Most of the groups I speak to, have no clue that you as a certified organic entity have your business name, your address, your email, your phone and more in a database for all the world to see – did you as a certified organic farmer or processor know that?

Well, it is true! For instance, do you know about this farm?

This is the Kirov Farm called Peresvet. You are looking at a portion of their organic certificate that I downloaded from the Organic Integrity Database (OID). But there is more:

In this picture you can see that Sun Xun grows Maize (corn), Soybeans and Wheat. I can call Mr. Xun on the phone if I want to make an international call because he lives in the Kirov District of the Russian Federation. Or I can email him and ask a quick question about maybe buying his wheat crop.

Based on this certificate, I now know pretty much everything about this organic operation I need to know to make contact and begin a discussion about his crops and a possible purchase or even a collaboration to expand our markets. This is exactly how I am able to send you a newsletter by email or mail since I can get both off of the OID website!

I asked Chat GPT to give me more information about this place and here is what it said:

The listing you shared is for an organic operation certified in the Russian Federation, specifically in Primorsky Krai within the Kirov District.

  • Primorsky Krai is a region in the Russian Far East, bordering China and North Korea, and stretching to the Pacific Ocean.
  • The Kirov District is one of the administrative divisions inside Primorsky Krai.
  • The crops listed (maize, soybeans, wheat) are fairly typical for the region, which has a mix of fertile plains and a temperate climate suitable for grains and legumes.

So, the only thing I am missing is a physical address so I could look up the farm on Google Earth but we are getting pretty close! I asked Chat GPT to do more searching and here is the result:

  • In QIMA’s “Supplier Details / Food Certifications Database,” “Peresvet” LLC (Kirov Farm) is listed with registry RU007-1, address in Kirov District, Primorsky Krai, and products: soybean, wheat, maize. ibd.com.br
  • In IBD’s certified operator list, LLC “Peresvet” (Kirov Farm) is listed under organic certification (CA23319/24), with the same RU007-1 ID. ibd.com.br
  • In Russian corporate registry data (via “saby.ru”), there is a company ООО Пересвет (Peresvet LLC) registered in Primorsky Krai / Ussuriysk with INN 7720493313, with a general director named Трачук Дарья Сергеевна (Trachuk Darya Sergeevna). Saby
  • That same registry listing shows that “wholesale grain trade” is its main business (among many activity codes) and that the authorized capital is quite small (50,000 ₽) compared to the vast acreage declared in OID. Saby
  • The registry also indicates the business was registered on 16 January 2020. Saby
  • In “spark-interfax.ru” (an information aggregator), ООО Пересвет has 119 (or 106 in other listings) registered types of business activities (OKVED codes), and the head or sole owner is the same Darya Trachuk. spark-interfax.ru

Okay, Okay I know I have proved my point!!

There is a lot that the OID can tell us about organic throughout the world, and you are a part of that world. I like to think that you are part of a large “family” since you all share both the benefits and rules of being in that organic family. We know that Mr. Xun yearly gets inspected and so do you!

Now that you know that information is in the database is there more information out there? Yes, there is a lot of information out there and it can be used a multitude of ways! First, you already know one way and that is for a mailing list like the one I use to send out email or mailed newsletters every month. I just go to the webpage https:// organic.ams.usda.gov/integrity/Home and then I do an advanced search. This allows me to sort the database on several criteria but for me, I want to know all the organic entities in Texas. I simply list Texas as the state and then search. In seconds I see the screen filled with all the Certified Texas Organic Entities, which includes both growers and handlers. I can then download that list to an Excel Spreadsheet (it has a place to click to download) which allows me to look at the data very in-depth.

Above is just a small screenshot of the Excel Spreadsheet I downloaded of all certified organic entities in Texas. If you want a closer look at the information, just click here: OID Certification for Texas

I can also find out if we grow any organic cotton in Texas and who grows it. I can find out who buys organic cotton in Texas and even who is making products from organic cotton in Texas. I can look up organic acres, find phone numbers, locate certifiers, I can see if you have a website, in fact there are many other places for you to tell the world about your business or advertise your business!

So, that leads me to ask why aren’t you using this as a business tool? If you are in the organic world then you can only buy or sell in the organic world and here is a free opportunity to advertise to that world. Unfortunately, I find so many mistakes in the database that I wonder if you are even paying attention! Wrong addresses, no addresses, bad emails, wrong crops, wrong products, misspelled names, no zip code, no company name. One of my pet peeves is to have your consultants name or their phone number and email as the contact person in the database. That just signals to folks that you don’t want to be contacted by anyone!

Here is my Call to Action: Claim Your Space

I have some thoughts – the database already tells the world you’re certified organic. Why not make it work for you?

  • Look up your entry. It is easy and I hope you now know how!
  • Make sure your contact information is correct. Call your certifier.
  • Make sure your products are listed correctly. Call your certifier.
  • Share the link with buyers: “You can find us in the USDA Organic Integrity Database.” That link can be a link to your Organic information like this:
  • Click this link! or like this Click this link!

Because you are special—and yes, everybody really does know it.

GMO Testing in Organic Cotton: What Farmers Need to Know

GMO detection in organic cotton does not automatically mean a farmer intentionally used genetically modified seed. This article explains how cotton is tested, what laboratory results mean, how GOTS and organic certifiers investigate positive findings, and what farmers can do to document compliance and reduce contamination risk.

Organic cotton farmers work hard to maintain their certification, ensuring that their crops are grown without synthetic chemicals, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), or prohibited inputs. Even when farmers follow organic practices to the letter, GMO contamination can still occur!

A young man in overalls holds a cotton flower and a test tube in a cotton field, with an older man in a lab coat observing samples at a table labeled 'Organic Cotton' in the background.

Let’s take a closer look at how GMO testing works, what the results mean, and why the final decision on certification can sometimes feel arbitrary.

GMO testing in Seed Cotton (raw cotton including fibers and seeds) is performed using real-time PCR analysis, a widely used method to detect genetic modification markers in cotton DNA. The gin will take samples of your seed cotton and submit those samples to their Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) Certifier.1 The GOTS Certifier will submit those samples to a lab, usually OMIC which will then run them for GMO presence. The results are then submitted back to the GOTS Certifier. Here are some things that are being investigated.

  • Standard Limit of Quantification (LOQ): 0.1% GMO content – This is the most commonly used threshold for accurately measuring contamination.
  • More Sensitive Tests: Some advanced labs claim they can detect levels as low as 0.01%, but I have not seen this as an industry-standard threshold for Seed Cotton testing. But you could see this from European labs!
  • Anything above a 0.1% is detectable and reported as such as you can tell from this test sheet with all the names removed!
  • GMO laboratories may report analytical limits of detection (LOD) or quantification (LOQ), and some test reports provide estimated percentages for individual genetic markers. These laboratory reporting limits should not be confused with a USDA organic tolerance or allowable GMO percentage. USDA organic regulations do not establish a numerical GMO tolerance for organic crops.

The material being tested matters. Seed and seed cotton contain abundant biological material suitable for DNA analysis, while mature lint presents greater analytical limitations; consequently, a positive screening result must be interpreted in light of both the sample material and the testing method.

Report of Analysis from OMIC USA Inc., detailing the results of a real-time TaqMan PCR test for various genetic markers, including detected and not detected GM-elements.
Supplementary report of analysis from OMIC USA Inc., detailing results of a real-time TaqMan PCR test for various genetic elements in a cotton sample, including detection levels and quantification limits.
  • This sample contains GMO markers including Bt toxin (Cry1Ab/Ac) and herbicide resistance (otp/mepsps).
  • p35S, pFMV, and tNOS confirm genetic modification.
  • Detection of these GMO markers would likely trigger additional investigation and could affect acceptance of the cotton into a GOTS or other private textile supply chain. The result alone, however, does not establish that the producer violated USDA organic requirements.
  • If contamination was unintentional, an investigation might be needed to determine if the cotton can still qualify for certain supply chains.
MarkerDetected?GMO Trait Significance
SAH7 (Cotton Gene)✔ YesConfirms valid cotton DNA
Cry1Ab/Ac (Bt Toxin)✔ 1.44%Indicates Bt Cotton (Insect Resistance)
otp/mepsps (Glyphosate Resistance)✔ 0.47%Possible Roundup Ready Cotton (Herbicide Resistance)
p35S (CaMV Promoter)✔ 1.93%Common GMO activation switch
PAT (Glufosinate Resistance)❌ Not DetectedNo Liberty Link herbicide resistance
pFMV (FMV Promoter)✔ 1.91%Used for GMO gene activation
tNOS (Terminator)✔ 3.27%Common GMO terminator sequence
GM Elements (General GMO Presence)✔ YesConfirms GMO modification detected

USDA organic certification is a process-based standard, not a zero-tolerance GMO standard. Genetic engineering is an excluded method and cannot be intentionally used in organic production. However, USDA National Organic Program Policy Memo 11-13 makes an important distinction between the intentional use of genetically engineered material and its inadvertent presence.2 When an organic producer has used appropriate non-GMO planting seed, followed the approved Organic System Plan, and implemented reasonable measures to prevent contact with GMOs, the detection of GMO material does not by itself establish a violation of USDA organic requirements.

This distinction is especially important with cotton. A qualitative GMO screening test can establish that GM-associated DNA was detected in the sample, but that result alone does not establish how the material got there. Potential sources can include the planting seed, pollen-mediated gene flow, post-harvest mixing, transportation or storage, and commingling during ginning. The appropriate response to a positive result is therefore trace-back and investigation—not an automatic assumption that the farmer planted GMO cotton.

What happens when an organic cotton sample tests positive for GMOs? That really depends on a lot of different things, and this is where farmers can get frustrated. I have provided you with some sample test results but usually you won’t even see these results. At this point the GOTS Certifier for the Gin has your test results. This is a small list of what they do:

  • No intentional use of GMOs is allowed.
  • If contamination is detected, the circumstances and possible source should be investigated, including seed documentation, production practices, segregation and potential commingling.
  • If the farmer can prove they used verified non-GMO seed and followed organic practices, then there is a strong possibility that they may still be approved.

The next step is for the GOTS Certifier to reach out to your Organic Certifier at the farm level. Because a “red flag” is now waving, your certifier is going to be looking at your Organic System Plan (OSP) with a fine-toothed comb! They will be looking at your cottonseed information, at your field and field locations, at every record you submitted to determine if there is anything that might have caused a “voluntary” versus “involuntary” contamination. You will probably know that something is up either by just a notice of an investigation or possibly a full-blown visit. Either way, they (your certifier) are trying to find out why the raw seed cotton is showing up with detectable levels of GMO.

Most of the time there is absolutely nothing you did to cause a detectable limit of GMO in your seed cotton. We might call this an “Act of God” because no one knows why it happens. The planting seed tested good, the field was good and there is no drift. No one knows what happened or why and so you get a clean bill of health. The system is designed with some flexibility because there can be an “Act of God” and to be honest I am glad to recognize that God is Sovereign even over cotton fields and cotton farmers!

On the other hand, it can sometimes be identified as a wrong bag of planting seed picked up, a wrong module or bale marking, or some other contamination issue along the way. Elevated levels of GMO in your raw seed cotton will throw up all kinds of red flags and could lead to a non-compliance, rejected organic cotton and a microscopic look at all other aspects of your organic operation! Let’s hope we don’t go there……

  • Test early and often. If you suspect contamination, conduct your own tests before sending cotton to market. Newsletter Article Page 2
  • Maintain strong records. Prove that you sourced verified non-GMO seed and followed organic protocols.
  • Work with a certifier who understands the realities of farming. Some certifiers are more flexible in their investigations than others or ask the right questions instead of just assuming you are wrong.
  • Improve segregation. Make sure that cotton stays separate at every stage, from harvesting to ginning.

Organic farmers face an uphill battle when it comes to avoiding GMO contamination. Even with perfect compliance, your cotton test results can find GMOs, and certification decisions often depend on factors beyond the farmer’s control. Don’t panic and be willing to go the extra mile to find out why. Your organic certifier has their neck on the line too as does your ginner and we all want you to succeed. As we are at the very start of a new crop year do all you can now to stay out of this “mess” later!

  1. Organic Cotton Accelerator. 2024. Standard Operating Procedure for GMO Sampling and Testing. Organic Cotton Accelerator. ↩︎
  2. USDA National Organic Program. 2011. “Policy Memo 11-13: Genetically Modified Organisms.” Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. ↩︎
Text listing the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program, and Transition to Organic Partnership Program, along with the USDA Organic logo.

Biopesticides and Biostimulants: Innovation, Challenges, and Growth

Introduction

Biopesticides and biostimulants are at the forefront of organic agriculture, offering natural solutions for pest control and plant health. While these products have gained popularity, the industry faces both opportunities and challenges as it evolves. This post explores the similarities and differences between biopesticides and biostimulants, their regulatory landscape, and what the future holds for these technologies.

Defining Biopesticides and Biostimulants

First let’s look at Biopesticides

Biopesticides are derived from natural materials, including microorganisms, plants, and minerals, to control pests and diseases. They function through competition, antibiosis, or physiological disruption of target organisms. Biopesticides as a category are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as is detailed below!

Types of Biopesticides:
  • Microbial Biopesticides: Contain beneficial bacteria, fungi, viruses, or protozoa that suppress pests (e.g., Bacillus thuringiensis Bt for caterpillar control).
  • Biochemical Biopesticides: Utilize plant extracts, pheromones, and essential oils to affect pest behavior or physiology. For example, Thyme oil or Neem oil would fit this category.
  • Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs): Genetic material introduced into plants, such as Bt proteins in genetically modified (GMO) crops. These are not to be used in organic production but are considered a biopesticide.

This image above is from the EPA website for Biopesticides. Click on the image to go to the website and check on a biopesticides registration!

How a Company Determines the Need for EPA Approval for a Biopesticide

A company developing a new biopesticide must determine if its product falls under EPA regulation by assessing the active ingredient, intended use, and mode of action. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) mandates that any substance intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating pests must be registered as a pesticide with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A company should ask the following questions to assess if its product qualifies as a biopesticide requiring EPA registration:

  1. Does the product actively control pests, pathogens, or weeds?
    • If the product claims direct pest suppression, it is a pesticide and requires EPA approval.
    • If it only enhances plant health without targeting pests directly, it may qualify as a biostimulant and not require EPA registration.
  2. What is the mode of action?
    • If the product kills, inhibits, or repels pests, it is considered a pesticide.
    • If the product works by stimulating plant defenses or improving nutrient uptake, it may not require registration.
  3. Is the active ingredient a known biopesticide or plant extract?
    • If the active ingredient is a microorganism, plant extract, or biochemical compound known to suppress pests, it likely needs EPA registration.
    • The EPA maintains a list of registered biopesticide active ingredients, and companies should check if similar compounds are already registered.
  4. Are pesticidal claims being made on the label?
    • If the product claims pest control properties (e.g., “kills fungi,” “controls insects”), it falls under FIFRA jurisdiction and requires EPA registration.
    • If the product only states benefits like “enhances plant vigor” or “improves root growth,” it may avoid registration.

Biostimulants

Biostimulants enhance plant growth, stress tolerance, and nutrient efficiency without directly targeting pests or diseases. Unlike biopesticides, they do not require EPA registration, leading to a highly unregulated market.

That said as a disclaimer there are many biostimulants that do a good job at preventing, controlling or managing for pests in crops. They can have a dual function even though they don’t have an EPA registration – a definite grey area!

Key Categories of Biostimulants:
  • Microbial Biostimulants: Beneficial bacteria and fungi that improve nutrient uptake and plant stress resilience.
  • Seaweed and Plant Extracts: Natural compounds that stimulate plant metabolism and root development.
  • Amino Acids and Humic Substances: Organic molecules that enhance soil health and nutrient availability.
  • For a complete look at biostimulants check out this post and the many different types available. Biostimulants: The Next New Frontier

This chart above (just click on it for a larger image) shows how an SAR system works in the plant. In many cases an SAR developed biostimulant will also be labeled with EPA as a biopesticide simply because it does control specific pests in the plant while boosting the plants defense mechanisms.

Similarities Between Biopesticides and Biostimulants
  • Both are used in sustainable and organic agriculture to reduce reliance on synthetic chemicals.
  • Derived from natural sources, including microorganisms and plant extracts.
  • Improve overall plant health, either through disease suppression (biopesticides) or enhanced resilience (biostimulants).
  • Can be combined with conventional or organic inputs in integrated pest and crop management (IPM/ICM).
FeatureBiopesticidesBiostimulants
Primary PurposeControl pests and diseasesImprove plant growth and resilience
MechanismDirectly targets pests/pathogensEnhances plant physiological processes
RegulationSubject to pesticide regulations (EPA, OMRI)Less regulatory oversight, often considered soil amendments
Mode of ActionAntibiosis, competition, parasitismHormonal stimulation, nutrient uptake efficiency
ExamplesBacillus subtilis for fungal disease controlSeaweed extracts for drought tolerance

Industry Challenges and Regulatory Considerations

One of the biggest challenges in the biostimulant industry is the lack of clear regulations. While biopesticides undergo rigorous EPA evaluation, biostimulants can be marketed with minimal oversight. This has led to the proliferation of products with unverified claims, making it difficult for growers to differentiate effective solutions from ineffective ones.

Government agencies are actively considering regulatory frameworks for biostimulants to ensure quality control without stifling innovation. The Biostimulant Industry Alliance and other trade organizations are working to establish scientific standards and promote best practices.

Market Trends and Future Outlook

Despite challenges, the biopesticide and biostimulant markets are poised for significant growth. Market research predicts a continued rise in demand due to increasing consumer preference for organic and residue-free crops. Additionally, advancements in microbial formulations and AI-driven precision agriculture will enhance the effectiveness of these products.

Data and Charts from Industry Sources

1. Projected Market Growth of Biopesticides and Biostimulants (2020-2030)
  • Data Source: Market research reports from MarketsandMarkets, Mordor Intelligence, and Research and Markets.
  • Methodology: Extrapolation of market size based on reported CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) values of 12-15% for biopesticides and 13-16% for biostimulants from recent industry reports.

References:

  • MarketsandMarkets (2023). Biopesticides Market – Global Forecast 2028.
  • Mordor Intelligence (2023). Biostimulants Market Analysis & Forecast 2028.
  • Research and Markets (2023). Trends in Agricultural Biologicals.
2. Investment Trends in Biostimulant Research and Development (2015-2025)
  • Data Source: Reports from AgFunder, FAO, and OECD on global agricultural input investments.
  • Methodology: Estimation based on reported investments in biologicals, venture capital funding for agri-tech startups, and projected R&D budgets from industry leaders.

References:

  • AgFunder (2023). Investment in AgTech and Biostimulants.
  • FAO (2023). Sustainable Agriculture and Innovation Trends.
  • OECD (2022). Trends in Agricultural R&D.
3. Adoption Rates of Biostimulants Across Different Crop Sectors
  • Data Source: Surveys and adoption studies from USDA, European Biostimulant Industry Council (EBIC), and International Biostimulants Forum.
  • Methodology: Aggregated adoption data from industry reports and regional case studies, indicating highest adoption in vegetable and fruit production, with lower adoption in ornamentals.

References:

  • USDA (2023). Adoption of Biostimulants in U.S. Crop Production.
  • EBIC (2023). European Biostimulants Market Report.
  • International Biostimulants Forum (2022). Global Trends in Biological Crop Inputs.
4. Regulatory Differences Between Biopesticides and Biostimulants
  • Data Source: Regulations from EPA, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and USDA Organic Program.
  • Methodology: Comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks governing product registration, scientific validation, and market oversight for biopesticides versus biostimulants.

References:

  • EPA (2023). Biopesticide Registration Guidelines.
  • EFSA (2023). Regulatory Framework for Biostimulants in the EU.
  • USDA (2023). Organic Input Standards and Market Oversight.

Understanding the Proper Use of Organic and Biological Products in Pest Control

I am asked all the time about organic and biological products. I have over 130 OMRI approved products on a list for controlling pests (weeds, disease and insects) in organic crops. As more growers turn to organic and biological products for pest control, it’s important to understand the nuances of their application. Unlike synthetic chemicals, these products require careful consideration of environmental conditions, mixing procedures, and application timing to be effective. People assume that the Extension Organic Specialist will know every product on the list and how they work – Wrong! I do know about many, but I am also very dependent on growers who use the products telling me about their experiences. I include a lot of that information in the list below.

To view the 5 Excel Sheets or to Download just click on the picture above.

Why Choose Biological Control Products?

Biological control products, while sometimes slower to act than botanical oils or mineral oils, offer several advantages. These products, often derived from beneficial fungi or bacteria, work by stopping insect feeding almost immediately. Over several hours, they gradually degrade the exoskeleton of pests and can also target eggs and larvae, preventing their development.

While oils can provide a quick knockdown effect, they can be harsh on crops, especially in regions like Texas where intense heat and light can exacerbate their impact. This makes biological products generally a safer option for maintaining crop health.

The Importance of Water pH and Quality

One of the most overlooked aspects of using organic and biological sprays is the pH and quality of the water used for mixing. In Texas, our hard water is notorious for high mineral content, which can bind with the active ingredients in sprays, reducing their effectiveness.

For most biological products, it’s crucial to buffer your water to a pH of 5.5-6.5. This range helps to ensure that the organisms remain stable and active in the solution. An exception is Pyganic, a natural pyrethroid, which is highly sensitive to pH. For Pyganic, water buffered to a pH of 4.0-5.0 is ideal for maximizing its efficacy.

Additionally, always use warm water, not cold, when mixing your sprays. Warm water helps the biologicals to remain active and mix more evenly, preventing the clumping that can occur with cold water.

Timing Your Application

Timing is everything when it comes to applying organic and biological products. Unlike synthetic chemicals, these products are sensitive to environmental conditions, particularly UV radiation. Applying them in the evening or at dusk is ideal for several reasons:

  • Reduced UV Exposure: UV radiation can degrade biological products quickly. Applying in the evening allows the product to remain effective longer.1
  • Insect Activity: Many insects are more active when it’s cooler and there’s less light, making it easier to target them effectively.
  • Improved Residual Effect: Spraying in the evening allows the droplets to stay moist longer, thanks to slightly higher humidity. This moisture helps the product adhere better to the plant surfaces and provides residual protection overnight.2

Click on this picture above to read about adjuvants

The Role of Organic Adjuvants in Biological Spray Applications

Organic adjuvants play a critical role in enhancing the performance of biological and organic spray products. By reducing the surface tension of the spray solution, adjuvants help the product spread more evenly across plant surfaces, ensuring better coverage of leaves, stems, and other target areas.

In addition to improving coverage, adjuvants help prevent biological products from drying out too quickly. Many beneficial organisms, such as fungi and bacteria, require time to adhere to the plant surface and begin their activity. Rapid drying can reduce their effectiveness. By maintaining moisture on the surface longer, adjuvants enhance the opportunity for these organisms to establish and do their job effectively.

When selecting an organic adjuvant, ensure it is compatible with the biological product you are using. Always follow label recommendations for application rates and test compatibility in a small jar test if you’re mixing multiple products. Proper use of surfactants can make a significant difference in achieving the desired results from your pest control program.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Many growers who experience issues with organic products often trace the problem back to a few common mistakes:

  1. Improper Mixing: Failing to buffer water or using cold water can lead to reduced efficacy. Always mix according to the product’s instructions and monitor the pH closely.
  2. Environmental Conditions: Applying products during the heat of the day or in bright sunlight can degrade their effectiveness. Always aim for cooler, less bright times of the day.3
  3. Timing: Don’t rush your application. Ensure that you’re applying at the right time to maximize the product’s impact.

Conclusion

By understanding and addressing these factors, you can significantly improve the effectiveness of your organic and biological pest control efforts. Remember, the success of these products often hinges on the details—proper mixing, the right environmental conditions, and timely application.

I encourage you to share your experiences and any questions you might have in the comments below. Together, we can continue to refine our practices and improve the outcomes of organic farming.

  1. The timing of pesticide application can significantly affect the level and persistence of pesticide residues. Evening applications generally lead to higher pesticide residue levels over a longer period compared to morning applications.
    Key Findings
    Effect of Application Timing: Evening applications of pesticides tend to result in higher residue levels that persist longer. This is because the conditions in the evening, such as lower temperatures and reduced sunlight, slow down the degradation of pesticides, allowing residues to remain on plants for extended periods (Norida et al., 2023; Moraes et al., 2021; Makram. et al., 2020).
    Degradation Factors: Sunlight and UV exposure are critical in the degradation of pesticides. Pesticides degrade more effectively when exposed to direct sunlight in the morning compared to the evening, as seen in studies where morning sunlight led to more significant degradation of certain pesticides (Makram. et al., 2020).
    Impact on Efficacy: The effectiveness of pesticides can also vary with the time of application. For instance, some studies have shown that morning applications can be more effective in controlling certain pests due to better environmental conditions for pesticide action (Skuterud et al., 1998; Moraes et al., 2021).
    Environmental Considerations: Applying pesticides in the evening can reduce the immediate impact on non-target organisms, such as bees, as residues have more time to dissipate before these organisms become active again in the morning (Swanson et al., 2023).
    Conclusion
    Evening applications of pesticides generally result in higher and more persistent residue levels compared to morning applications. This is due to slower degradation rates in the absence of sunlight and cooler temperatures. While this can enhance the persistence of pesticide effects, it also raises concerns about prolonged exposure to residues. Therefore, the timing of pesticide application should be carefully considered to balance efficacy and environmental impact.

    References
    Skuterud, R., Bjugstad, N., Tyldum, A., & Tørresen, K. (1998). Effect of herbicides applied at different times of the day. Crop Protection, 17, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(98)80020-3
    Norida, M., Yahya, S., & Ghazali, F. (2023). Effectiveness of Homemade Repellents and Spray Timing in Controlling Insect Pest in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and Chinese Mustard (Brassica rapa var. Parachinensis). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1208. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1208/1/012021
    Swanson, L., Melathopoulos, A., & Bucy, M. (2023). Systematic review of residual toxicity studies of pesticides to bees and comparison to language on pesticide labels using data from studies and the Environmental Protection Agency. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.05.543089
    Moraes, H., Ferreira, L., De Souza, W., Faria, R., De Freitas, M., & Cecon, P. (2021). Spray volume, dose and time of day of glyphosate application in the control of Urochloa brizantha. Bioagro. https://doi.org/10.51372/bioagro333.1
    Makram., S., Ibrahim, H., & Mohammed., M. (2020). EFFECT OF DIRECT SUNLIGHT AND UV-RAYS ON DEGRADATION OF BUPIRIMATE, PENCONAZOLE AND PROFENOFOS. **. https://doi.org/10.21608/fjard.2020.189675 ↩︎
  2. Ibid ↩︎
  3. Ibid ↩︎